Myths and Cultivated Lies about Sati Pratha

 How they bend historical evidence without bothering to look deeper into the subject—this is what I call Parrot Humanoid Syndrome

Passages extracted from 2008 enlarged edition of my 2004 publication
Christianity in a different Light

Sati Pratha too ~ even before it began!

...So, let us return to PrithviRaaj Chauhan. Do you remember that episode when JaiChand’s father VijayPaal died and his mother RoopSundari wanted to commit Sati. Well, the writer-director-producer-trio had learned from their ChristianizedEnglish education system that Hindus followed Sati Pratha. That education system had taught them that Hinduism had been ridden with such inhuman rituals. So, they could not restrain their desire to help Hindu audiences by making them aware of it. They also wanted to show that the young JaiChand was one of the reformers, for he wouldn’t agree to his mother committing Sati, such a disgusting tradition after all. He had to break the tradition. And writer-director-producer-trio considered it their duty to bring about similar awareness among Hindu masses of today and the Hindu youth in particular. For, they read one obscure instance of some 80 odd year old woman bent upon committing Sati on her husband’s death. English media news papers were agog with this news item because they are paid by those who control their funding to blow-up such odd instances beyond proportion. While there was plenty of talk about a woman committing Sati but little talk about it being a solely voluntary act with no force exerted on her. So, our trio could not resist the opportunity to plug-in Sati issue in their story as well.

Our writer-director-producer-trio had not thought it necessary to do some historical research on the issue[2]. When did Sati Pratha start in BhaaratVarsh? Some fools think that it began with DakshYagya, self-immolation by Sati and following establishment of Shakti Peeths all over BhaaratVarsh. Thus, they take it for granted that this system prevailed since time immemorial and take liberty to plug it in just anywhere through the Hindu history as they feel like. They do not realize what harm they are inflicting by spreading their ignorance using a powerful tool like media as their vehicle.

Murdering History in historical episode[3]

Sati Pratha began after Jauhar by Padmini. Allauddin Khilji wanted Padmini. He tried in vain to defeat Rana of Chittor. So, he extended a hand of friendship. Hindus traditionally valued word of mouth and never cheated on it (evidences after evidences documented by foreign visitors to this Hindu land can be found in my other work Do your History textbooks tell you these Facts?). Expecting the same Rana accepted it. And then, Allauddin Khilji cheated[4] Rana. Padmini chose to commit self-immolation because she did not want to fall in hands of Allauddin Khilji.

As time passed by, Hindu women had realized that if they wanted to save their chastity, self-immolation was the solution for them. For, Allauddin Khilji was not an exception, practically every Muslim man was same. Hindu women considered one-husband relationship during one life time as absolutely essential. The concept of chastity was a self-imposed one, not imposed externally. This is something that Christians would never understand. And Christian Missionaries would never allow an average Christian to understand that. Christian history is witness that Christian Missionaries themselves practiced en-mass adultery[5]. Christian women wouldn’t even understand this. For, in today’s liberated environment for them, they do not mind sleeping with plenty of men while unmarried, and many of them don’t even mind doing so while they are married. With advent of globalization it is not only national economies that are affected but also cultural values are also under unprecedented attack. Hindu women are rapidly becoming like their Christian counterparts in these matters. Ground has been well prepared with Christian Missionary education of Hindu women over past six generation. But in earlier days Hindu women were not made that way. They preferred to give up their body rather than being with men other than their husband. And, in vast majority of cases it used to be only voluntary, no force used. But then Christian Missionaries with the help of the ChristianEnglish Education System and Media (newsprint) taught Hindus the opposite: that Sati Pratha was an ancient Hindu tradition and was representative of inhuman oppression by men over women. And they also propagated it throughout the world with intent to malign the face of Hinduism. For, they had found themselves incapable of eliminating Hinduism from the face of this earth, which they had done to all other religions[6] all over the world.

Present day ChristianizedHindus have learned from their masters not to apply their own head but to keep parroting whatever they have learned from those manipulators. They take quite a pride in carrying on the job entrusted to them by their masters. In this manner they spread their ignorance far and wide using the power of media and all other tolls available at their disposal.

Now let us look at the dates from history and analyze them in perspective:

This was the origin of Sati Pratha in Hindu BhaaratVarsh which Hindu ladies found as only solution in the wake of barbarian Muslims all around. And those Christian Missionaries (fraudster[9] in my view) whose sole objective was to convert Hindus (wretched people in their view) into Christianity by hook or crook ~ they shoved down the throat of Hindu children all this garbage, and by repetition over six generation using textbooks and media of every kind ~ they made Hindu children digest it and assimilate it into their whole system over the period so that they keep parroting it well. This is why; ‘counter repetition’ is only solution to erase these fraudulent concepts from Hindu psyche. But a few handful ‘I already know all’ variety guys find themselves opposed to ‘counter repetition’ though they hardly understand it significance.

[1] in continuation of "Children of Ramanand Sagar" 

[2] Probably because they were primarily aiming at a HatimTai like fiction which they had recently telecast with some success. That is probably why you would find plenty of tales in their Prithvi Raaj as were in HatimTai. It perhaps did not matter to them that while HatimTai may have been an imaginative character, Prithvi Raaj has been a living legend. So, they made Prithvi Raaj (while a minor) do plenty of such heroic deeds as HatimTai. They would claim that they have taken PrithviRaaj Raaso of Chand Bardaai as the base. However, they refrain to clarify how much has been modified or added by scriptwriter on their own to make it appealing or whatever. When there are number of versions of PrithviRaaj Raaso by Chand Bardaai floating around, which one have they consulted is also becomes a question 6-8-2008

[3] in continuation of "Children of Ramanand Sagar"

[4] Treachery/cheating came naturally to Muslims. It began with founder of Islam, who not only practiced it, but also documented clear instructions to effect in Qur’an calling it Allah’s word. If you seek quotes from Qur’an in evidence, you are welcome to read my other works.

[5] documented evidence can be found later in this book itself 

[6] except Islam, and therefore, both had been on loggerheads all the while, thirsty for each others blood 

[7]  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prithviraj_Chauhan6-1-2008 

[8] by treachery of yet another Muslim named Muhammad Gori 

[9] Refer to 2003-05 Beware of this Aasuric Culture - or else your soul will die

Parrot has been defined as "a repeater of something that somebody else has said, without thought or understanding "

Humanoid has been defined as "describes a being from another planet that has the appearance or characteristics of a human "

Syndrome has been defined as "a group of things or events that form a recognizable pattern, especially of something undesirable"