Christianity in a different Light : Face behind the Mask

Written between Oct-Nov 2003 and Jan-Feb 2004 — Published in Print March 2004 — Enlarged 2008 — Published in Print 2008 — Enlarged 2009 — Published 2009

Face behind the Mask

2011 Dec 21, 16:47 +05:30

We, the Hindoos in India and abroad, have been made to learn, and come to believe, that Christianity happens to be a religion of Love, Peace and Service to Humanity; and aberrations to that belief system, if any, represented exception, not rule.

I, too, believed in it for fifty years of my life. Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi, whom we call a महात्मा Mahaatmaa, in other words a great soul, coined the term सर्व धर्म समभाव Sarv' Dharm' Samabhaav', which has been understood differently by different people. Some thought it meant that we should maintain same outlook and/or same feeling towards all religions. Some perceived it differently to mean that all religions have the same belief system, and thereby, they all happen to be equal.

Gandhi propagate his hypothesis so aggressively that people after him took the cue and kept spreading it far and wide among Hindoos all over the world, and some even expanded on it by adding their own belief system that further supported the concept of Sarv' Dharm' Samabhaav', which was highly flawed from its very inception. To improvise on Gandhi's unfounded hypothesis, some later day intellectuals and preachers added, in support, the concept of वसुधैव कुटुम्बकम Vasudhaiv' Kutumbakam' by misinterpreting it to mean just the opposite of what it truly conveyed. Others even ascribed its origin to Hindoo Vedic philosophy without even caring to find out what its true origin was. Put together, all this intellect combine, inflicted immense harm to Hindoo psyche making it almost impotent.

Gandhi enjoyed tremendous influence over Hindoo psyche, and Hindoos readily accepted his unfounded hypothesis as a theory of substance, while Muslims and Christians and Jews ignored it without commenting, and that kept the Hindoos under mistaken impression that other religions too support the same belief system and/or do not disagree with it.

Quotes from Holy Bible and from History of Christianity

2003 Nov-Dec

authorized bibleIn this work I shall be quoting extensively from Christian Bible and the documented history of Christianity. I shall also be quoting real-life conducts of many Popes, Cardinals, Archbishops, Bishops, and well respected Saints of Christianity. By doing so, I shall try to demonstrate a close link between the teachings of Christian Bible and shaping of characters of Christian Popes, Cardinal, Archbishops, Bishops and Saints of Christianity. I shall also try to demonstrate how those teachings of Christian Bible have percolated down to the level of Christian men, women and children. For this I shall be exposing many real-life incidences from the Christian World. I shall also try to demonstrate what kind of influence it has had on Hindoo men, women and children. This influence is a matter of major concern to me. Or else, I would not have bothered peeping into the forbidden territory of the Christian World.

I shall be reproducing the teachings of Christian Bible verbatim. If some people accuse me of disturbing communal harmony by doing so, they would better accuse Christian Bible for that, because I am simply bringing out the facts that most people in India are ignorant of till today, as I had been all my life, until recently, though I am supposed to be well educated and travelled extensively, a quality that did not enlighten me any better on the subject in hand. This work is essentially in service to Hindoo society, which has been kept in dark for long, and that too deliberately with purpose. While reproducing text from Christian Bible I shall retain pre-existing emphasis in form of italics, and add further emphasis with underline and/or bold to certain words, solely to draw your attention towards their significance.

I shall be using the Vatican Authorized King James Version of Holy Bible. I have purchased a copy published by Broadman & Holman Publishers of Belgium in 1996 with ISBN 0-8400-3625-4. I shall also be providing you with meanings, descriptions, definitions of Biblical terminology from The New Oxford Dictionary of English published in 2001 with ISBN 019565432-3. I was looking for a good coverage for such terminology and this is the most voluminous dictionary that I could lay my hands on. It has 2,152 pages of 28.5 cm by 22.5 cm. I had seen Prof. D. Meo using this dictionary during my visit to Venezia, Italia and I specially ordered a copy for my use through Strand Book Stalls at Mumbai. In my research work I use many resources and their credibility is of utmost importance to me.

About Holy Bible

Old Testament is the first part of the Christian Bible Oxford Dictionary p 1291
New Testament is the second part of the Christian Bible Oxford Dictionary p 1249
Old Testament is of Jewish origin and New Testament is of Christian origin and both make together first and second part of Christian Bible.

The hidden (from Hindoos) link between Jews and Christians. Why then Jews and Christian were after one another's blood? Read below and you will have the clue. Read further Judaism Christianity Islam Secularism Hinduism and you will have the clarity!

Jesus Christ said (1) why I have descended from Heaven

St Matthew was an Apostle and the author of the first Gospel Oxford Dictionary p1143
Each of the twelve chief disciples of Jesus Christ is an Apostle Oxford Dictionary p77
Gospel is the record of Jesus Christ's life and teachings in the first four books of the New Testament Oxford Dictionary p792

Christian Bible, Matthew 10:34 Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword. Holy Bible p757

Wage war against those who do not agree with me!

St Luke was an evangelist and the author of the third Gospel Oxford Dictionary p1099
Christian Bible, Luke 12:51 Suppose ye that I am come to give peace on earth? I tell you, Nay; but rather division: Holy Bible p815
Nay a negative answer. Oxford Dictionary p1237

Divide them! 

Jesus Christ said (2) what I have come to give to the Humanity

Christian Bible, Matthew 10:35 For I am come to set a man at variance against his father, and the daughter against the mother, and the daughter in law against her mother in law. 10:36 And a man’s foe shall be they of his own household. Holy Bible p757

Split the Family! Destroy their unity! Turn family members enemy of each other!

Christian Bible, Luke 12:52 For from henceforth there shall be five in one house divided, three against two, and two against three. 12:53 The father shall be divided against the son, and the son against the father; the mother against the daughter, and the daughter against the mother; the mother in law against her daughter in law, and the daughter in law against her mother in law. Holy Bible p815

Family threadbare!

St Thomas was an Apostle, meaning chief disciple of Jesus Christ Oxford Dictionary p1928 and p77 respectively
Gospel of Thomas 16 Jesus said: Perhaps men think that I came to cast peace on the world; and they do not know that I came to cast division upon earth, fire, sword, war. For five will be in a house, there will be three against two and two against three, the father against the son and the son against the father. And they will stand because they are single ones.
Ref: The Secret Sayings of Jesus (according to the Gospel of Thomas) Robert M Grant, et al, London as quoted in ISBN 81-85990-21-2 [1995] p76 n36

Put them one against the other! Make them quarrel!

Jesus Christ said (3) what I expect from my followers

Gospel of Thomas 56 Jesus said: He who will not hate his father and his mother cannot be my disciple. And he who will not hate his brothers and sisters, and carry his cross as I have, will not become worthy of me
Ref: The Secret Sayings of Jesus (according to the Gospel of Thomas) Robert M Grant, et al, London as quoted in ISBN 81-85990-21-2 [1995] p76 n36

Hate your loved ones!

Christian Bible, Luke 14:26 If any man come to me, and hate not his father, and mother, and wife, and children, and brethren, and sisters, yea, and his own life also, he cannot be my disciple. Holy Bible p817

Hate, Hate, Hate!

Christian God (and Jewish Lord) said this is My 1st Law

Statute in biblical use a law or decree made by a sovereign, or by God. Oxford Dictionary p 1818
Deuteronomy is the fifth book of the Bible. Oxford Dictionary p 504

Christian Bible Deuteronomy 12:1 These are the statutes and judgments, which ye shall observe to do in the land, which the LORD Godof thy fathers giveth thee to possess it, all the days ye live upon the earth. Holy Bible p168

Follow this till eternity! 

Christian God (and Jewish Lord) said this is My 2nd Law

Christian Bible Deuteronomy 12:2 Ye shall utterly destroy all the places, wherein the nations which ye shall possess served their Gods, upon the high mountains, and upon the hills, and every green tree: Holy Bible p168

Totally Destroy!

Christian Bible Deuteronomy 12:3 And ye shall overthrow their altars, and break their pillars, and burn their groves with fire; and ye shall hew down the graven images of their gods, and destroy the names of them out of that place. Holy Bible p168
Hew chop, cut with axe [Collins English Gem Dictionary p 246]
Graven image a carved idol or representation of a god used as an object of worship [Oxford Dictionary p 801]

Eliminate totally, wipe out even the names of their gods!

Christian God (and Jewish Lord) said this is My 3rd Law

Christian Bible Deuteronomy 13:6 If thy brother, the son of thy mother, or thy son, or thy daughter, or the wife of thy bosom, or thy friend, which is as thine own soul, entice thee secretly, saying, Let us go and serve other Gods, which thou hast not known, nor thy fathers; 13:7 Namely, of the gods of the people which are round about you, nigh unto thee, or far off from thee, from the one end of the earth even unto the other end of the earth; 13:8 Thou shalt not consent unto him, nor hearken unto him; neither shall thine eye pity him, neither shalt thou spare, neither shalt thou conceal him: 13:9 But thou shalt surely kill him; thine hand shalt be first upon him to put him to death, and afterwards the hands of all the people. 13:10 And thou shalt stone him with stones, that he die; because he hath sought to thrust thee away from the LORD thy God   Holy Bible p169

Kill with your own hands, your brother, your son, your daughter, your wife, your best friend by stoning him/her until he/she dies, if he/she tries to entice you to serve another god (convert into another religion).  

Christian God (and Jewish Lord) said this is My 4th Law

Christian Bible Deuteronomy 20:16 But of the cities of these people, which the LORD thy God doth give thee for an inheritance, thou shalt save alive nothing that breatheth: 20:17 But thou shalt utterly destroy them;  Holy Bible p175

Must not leave there anything alive that breaths

Christian God (and Jewish Lord) said this is My 5th Law

Christian Bible Deuteronomy 32:24 They shall be burnt with hunger, and devoured with burning heat, and with bitter destruction: I will also send the teeth of beasts upon them, with the poison of serpents of the dust. 32:25 The sword without, and terror within, shall destroy both the young man and the virgin, the suckling also with the man of gray hairs.  Holy Bible p187 

Make them starve
Throw them into fire
Spare not the babies sucking mother’s milk and old men of gray hair with their one foot in the grave - kill them all

Nature (character) of Christian God (and of Jewish Lord)

Nahum : a book of the Bible (Oxford Dictionary p 1228)
Nahum 1:2 God is jealous, and the LORD revengeth; the LORD revengeth, and is furious; the LORD will take vengeance on his adversaries, and he reserveth wrath for his enemies
Exodus is the second book of the Bible (Oxford Dictionary p 645)
34:14 For thou shalt worship no other god: for the LORD, whose name is Jealous, is a jealous God:

Jealous and revengeful is the Christian God and the Jewish Lord

Teachings of Christianity #1 (and of Judaism)

Christian Bible Exodus 23:24 Thou shalt not bow down to their gods, nor serve them, nor do after their works: but thou shalt utterly overthrow them, and quite break down their images. Holy Bible p68
Exodus
is the second book of the Bible (Oxford Dictionary p 645)

Destroy their idols!

Christian Bible Exodus 34:13 But ye shall destroy their altars, break their images, and cut down their groves: Holy Bible p79

Destroy everything that relates to their worship!

Great Teachings of Christianity #2 (and of Judaism)

Numbers the mainly narrative fourth book of canonical Jewish and Christian Scripture (Merriam-Webster Online)
Numbers is the fourth book of the Bible (Oxford Dictionary p 1272)

Christian Bible Numbers 31:17 Now therefore kill every male among little ones, and kill every woman that hath known man by lying with him. 31:18 But all the women children, that have not known a man by lying with him, keep alive for yourselves. Holy Bible p149
Every male among little ones = baby boys
Women that hath known man by lying with him = married women
women children that hath known man by lying with him = baby girls, virgins

Kill their every little male child, save the virgins for yourself!

Great Teachings of Christianity #3 (and of Judaism)

Isaiah a prophetic book of canonical Jewish and Christian Scripture — see bible table (Merriam-Webster online)
Isaiah was a major Hebrew prophet (Oxford Dictionary p 966)
Isaiah a book of the Bible bearing his name. Abbreviation:  Isa. (Dictionary.com)
Isaiah He was the earliest of the major prophets. (MSN Encarta online)

Christian Bible Isaiah 13:16 Their children also shall be dashed to pieces before their eyes; their houses shall be spoiled, and their wives ravished (*raped). Holy Bible p557
Ravish force a woman to have sexual intercourse against her will [Oxford Dictionary p 1541]
Dash strike or fling something somewhere with great force, especially so as to have a destructive effect [Oxford Dictionary p 468]

Kill their children! Rape their wives!

How well Christians followed the Laws of Christian God in India

Goa (1560-1812)

Children were flogged and slowly dismembered (*tear or cut limb from limb) in front of their parents, whose (*parents’) eyelids had been sliced off (*so they couldn’t close their eyes) to make sure they missed nothing.
Extremities (*the hands and feet) were amputated carefully, so that a person could remain conscious even when all that remained was a torso (*the trunk of the human body) and head.
Male genitals were removed and burned in front of wives, breasts hacked off and vaginas penetrated by swords while husbands were forced to watch. ...
And it went on for two hundred years.
The Empire of the Soul, Paul Williams Roberts, Harper Collins, 1999 quoted in The Saint Business, Rajeev Srinivasan, Hindu Voice, Nov 2003, pp. 4-5
For clarity a few meanings have been inserted immediately after the related word marked within brackets with asterisk; ex: Extremities (*the hands and feet) 

Puts beasts to shame!

On recommendation of a Saint of Christianity

The Goa Inquisition was established in 1560 as recommended earlier by Saint Francis Xavier, and finally abolished in 1812.
Although its headquarters were at Goa, its jurisdiction extended to entire Portuguese possessions to the East of the Cape of Good Hope, and it had its Commissaries in other major centers.
The Goa Inquisition, AK Priolkar, cover 3

To spread Christianity everywhere!

Now, have a taste of Hindoo teachings for a change

Friedrich Max Muller testified

“I have left to the last of the witness who might otherwise have been suspected – I mean the Hindoos themselves. The whole of their literature from one end to the other is pervaded by expressions of love and reverence for truth.”
“…I doubt whether in any other of the ancient literatures of the world you will find traces of that extreme sensitiveness of conscience which despairs of our ever speaking the truth...”
Max Muller, Friedrich, INDIA what can it teach us? Longmans, Green and Co., London, 1883, Penguin India Ed 2000, p59 and p67 respectively

Look at the results in the following pages

Sir Thomas Munro testified

Sir Thomas Munro, a Knight of the erstwhile British Empire and the eminent Governor of Madras
“If a good system of agriculture, unrivalled manufacturing skill, a capacity to produce whatever can contribute to either convenience or luxury, schools established in every village for teaching, reading, writing, and arithmetic, the general practice of hospitality and charity amongst each other, and above all, a treatment of the female sex full of confidence, respect, and delicacy, are among the signs which denote a civilized people – then the Hindoos are not inferior to the nations of Europe, and if civilization is to become an article of trade between England and India (India), I am convinced that England will gain by the import cargo.”
Quoted in Mill’s History, vol. i. p371, re-quoted by F Max Muller, p57, p231

A great civilization, indeed! Any doubts? Let us see more of it!

But then how things went wrong

Lord Macaulay proudly wrote to his father in 1836:
“Our English schools are flourishing wonderfully.... It is my belief that if our plans of education are followed up, there will not be a single idolater among the respectable classes in Bengal thirty years hence.”
quoted by Michel Danino, reproduced in IndiaCause Newsletter, 17 August 2003
Idolater: a person who worships an idol or idols, Oxford Dictionary, p909

This is how Hindoos were turned substantially anti-Hindoo

Lord Macaulay said:
“We must at present do our best to form a class who may be interpreters between us and the millions whom we govern; a class of persons, Indians (Indians) in blood and color, but English in taste, in opinions, in morals and in intellect
as stated by Macaulay himself, quoted by Dr. NS Rajaram, p181

This is how Hindoo civilization was thoroughly corrupted

I have already described how education can alter human nature and social values irreversibly

Hindoos believed in many gods — why — what was the result?

Why Hindoos believe in many gods?

Hindoos believe in many gods because God, who could create such an extraordinarily diverse universe, can easily assume any form He wants, at His will. He is under no compulsion to have or not to have a form. Besides, He can present Himself in as many forms as He may want.

Why Hindoos believe in God with form?

He has himself created humans, animals, birds, fishes, trees, and what not, just look around and you will see them. Then ask yourself a simple question: One who could create so many forms, can He not take that form for Himself?

Can He not present Himself in one of those forms if His devotee wants to see Him in that particular form, and if He is pleased with His devotee, and if He wishes to grant him the vision to see Him in the form of his choice?

What is the result of such belief?

As Hindoo believes in many gods, he does not fight on Hindoo god, Muslim god, and Christian god. For him, there are hundreds of gods, one more or one less does not make a difference to him.

That is why, when the first batch of refugee Syrian Christians arrived at Cranganore, Malabaar in India in the year 345 (running from the religious persecution of Persian King Shaapur II who considered them a state liability) Hindoo king not only gave them land to live but also to build church so that they could freely practice their own religion.
Similarly in Gujaraat, king SiddhRaja JaiSimh and his successors continued to provide Muslims trade settlers the opportunity to build mosques and freely practice their own religion, and as the inscriptions are witness, these things happened much before Gujaraat passed under Muslim rule after invasions of Ulugh Khan in 1299.

Christians do not believe in many gods — what is the result of such belief?

When I started looking at Christian Bible, I learned it pronounces death for idolaters, like Hindoos. That is why, these refugee Syrian Christians waited for thousand years, lived on Hindoo hospitality and finally, when Vasco da Gama arrived in India with his ship and cannons, they approached him and pleaded him to wage war against Hindoo king.

Persian King Shaapur II considered them a state liability and he was right. Hindoo kings treated them as state guests and the guests betrayed their hosts even after thousand years’ hospitality. Christian history is witness what Christianity has made of Christians.

Saint Francis Xavier took a large grant from Hindoo king of Quilon to build churches, and then he converted entire villages into Christianity in one stroke, and then he got Hindoo temples pulled down and Hindoo god idols destroyed, and he wrote to the Society of Jesus that he could not describe in words the joy he felt watching this happen.

In Christianity such people are respected as saints. In Hindooism such people are not respected because they possess inhumane qualities. The two religions are opposite in their values.

This is where the whole game begins:

Lessons before you proceed

1st lesson

I have a significant message for you at the end of this episode. After about 25 years break I took to spiritual readings again sometimes around Christmas of 1998. The first book on my hand was that of Paramahansa Yogananda’s Autobiography of a Yogi borrowed from Unionville Public Library in Markham, Canada. The book had received worldwide acclaim. Paramahansa Yogananda had been fairly successful in USA and gathered a fairly large following of white men and women. His book had a very significant impact on me. I bought several copies and gave as gift to my colleagues. I recommended it to many more. This book speaks of Jesus Christ very highly on numerous occasions, and draws a parallel between Christianity and Hindooism. It cemented my earlier impression that Christianity happened to be a great humanitarian religion. Today as I added a note about Trinity and Tridev, I thought it necessary to check if my 5 year-old-memory weren’t failing me. In the process, look, at what I unexpectedly stumbled on!

Author equated Hindoo teachings with teachings of Jesus

"Hindoo scriptures teach that family attachment is delusive if it prevents the devotee from seeking the Giver of all boons, including one of loving relatives, not to mention life itself. Jesus similarly taught: "He that loveth father or mother more than me is not worthy of me." - Matthew 10:37 (Bible).
An Autobiography of a Yogi, Paramahansa Yogananda, p 85 fn

Thus, declaring that Jesus similarly taught, Yogananda draws a parallel between Hindooism and Christianity. A reader takes his word for granted, because Paramahansa Yogananda sounds very sincere throughout this book and he creates an impression that he knows Christianity and Hindooism like the back of his hand. So, trusting him and at the same time unsure of the truth in his statement, I decided to check the Bible and, lo, what I find!

Did the author tell the whole truth to his readers and followers?

Bible, Matthew 10:34 Think not I am come to send peace on earth: I come not to send peace, but a sword.
10:35 For I am come to set a man at variance against his father, and the daughter against the mother, and the daughter in law against her mother in law.
10:36 And a man’s foe shall be they of his own household.
10:37 He that loveth father or mother more than me is not worthy of me; and he that loveth son or daughter more than me is not worthy of me.

Now think for a moment. Are the teachings of Hindooism and Jesus truly ‘similar’ as Paramahansa Yogananda made us to believe?

Let us expand on what Hindooism teaches us

Let me put it in my words. Hindooism teaches that any attachment whatsoever of any kind, be it towards parents, wife, children, relatives, friends, money, power, position, fame, or anything for that matter, which we come across in our day to day life in this mortal world, can effectively come in the way of attaining soul’s final dissolution into the Supreme Soul, which frees the soul from the cycle of birth and death.

The logic is simple, as long as we remain attached to these worldly things, we would naturally want to remain wrapped up in their thoughts, and we wouldn’t try adequately enough to advance towards the process of dissolution into the Supreme Soul.

Let us now expand on what Jesus of Bible taught

But Jesus says in no uncertain terms that he has not come to earth to bring peace, instead he has come to bring sword (war) and he has come to put son against father, daughter against mother, daughter-in-law against mother-in-law, and turn the family of a man as his foe (enemy); and in that context, one who loves his parents more than Jesus, in other words, does not turn against his parents, is not worthy of Jesus.
Why did the author deliberately suppress major part of the statement made by Jesus as documented in Bible?

On what basis Paramahansa Yogananda draws a parallel between Hindooism and Christianity in this particular context, and how does he use Mathew 10:37 by suppressing 10:34, 10:35, 10:36? Does Paramahansa Yogananda bring his readers and followers closer to the Truth or does he take them farther from the Truth? Why is it that he deliberately omitted stating 10:34, 10:35, 10:36 that indicate the context in which 10:37 was said?

Don’t think it was an unintended mistake; the author knew Bible rather too well to make such a clever mistake

Please do not pamper yourself with the thought that it was a simple mistake on his part. You would be fooling yourself if you do believe that. Paramahansa Yogananda knew Bible too well and gives the impression of having understood Jesus so well that he could not have simply made a mistake. You got to read the whole of Autobiography of a Yogi sincerely to know that it is simply not possible that it could have been an unintended mistake. This is one of the people whom I respected dearly, only to be disillusioned later!

Spiritual gurus promote their own-brand-religion

At his Self-Realization Fellowship Sunday gatherings at Toronto, I saw Shri Krishn and Jesus placed side by side at the altar. In today’s world these things create pretty good impression. Today, we live in a world of ‘Brand’ images. This is how different spiritual gurus promote their own-brand-religion! Today even religion is for marketing. As you will proceed through this work, you will see that this comes from the influence of Christianity. You tend to become the kind of company you keep, and the kind of influence you allow on yourself.

Therefore, you must be mentally prepared to look at things afresh disregarding your preconceived notions

When you read or listen to such celebrities, your impressions are formed based on what they convey to you. It is important that you train your mind to disregard those preconceived notions if you wish to derive any benefit from my work.

You must not trust, nor distrust whatever you have learned so far. You must be mentally prepared to absorb unexpected shocks, and also prepared to look at things afresh, if you wish to proceed with my work; otherwise, it is a wasted effort, please do not spend your time

2nd lesson

You may find a particular kind of repetition in my works 

You may find me expressing the core message in different ways, with different set of examples, in different scenarios, in different words, in different places.

Some of you may think that we are intelligent enough, why not say it once, and we understand. Granted that you are capable of understanding the message through a single expression. You may even not need to read my work, as you may be aware of the message already. But then, has it percolated down to your thoughts so deep that it already finds its expression in all your actions? If you were to ask this question to yourself, you may often find a big NO for the answer! Why?

This is how our minds are preprogrammed on a regular basis through exposure to mass media and prevailing education system

Most of our actions are guided not by ‘what should be done’ but by ‘what we are used to doing or seeing as done by others so often’. What we are used to doing often depends on ‘what we are used to thinking’. What we are used to thinking often depends on ‘what we have been taught all along’ or ‘what we get to see or hear so often’. What we get to see or hear or read so often depends generally on ‘what receives regular media exposure’. What receives regular media exposure mostly depends on ‘what they want to show you or let you know’. Who are they? They could be those who control the media or they could be those who are associated with media in one way or other. Similarly, ‘what you have been taught all along’ depends on ‘who designed your school text books and with what underlying motive?’. ‘What their underlying motives are’ depends on ‘who they are’ and ‘what their ideology is’. If they are from CommunistMarxist block they will design text books in one manner. If they are Christian missionaries they will design them in another manner. They all have their vested interest and hidden agenda. They won’t give you truth.

This is why we need the repetition of alternate thought process to counteract the age-long repetition caused by education system and mass media

The point is, our actions are often guided by our preconceived notions or preprogramming of our minds, which is attained through the education system of which we are part of, and through repeated media exposure. This is where we need the repetition of alternate thought process to counteract the repetition caused by education system and mass media.

You need to also appreciate that the reading habits of people are not same

There is yet another reason. I do not expect all my readers to read all my books, and also read them sequentially. These books are all interconnected and revolve around one basic theme, that is, the human life and its various aspects. Nor do I expect all my readers even to read one of my single books in continuity from start to end. Different people have different kind of reading habits. Some just open a book casually and start reading one section that may attract their attention at that given point of time. Therefore, I need to repeat things over without which that section of that book may not be complete. Yet, my primary reason remains to be the one I have explained in earlier paragraphs. 

Curtain Raiser

There was a Great Civilization though, today, it may sound like a fairy tale because Christian missionary education system prevalent in our country did not tell us about this

Sir Thomas Munro, a Knight of the erstwhile British Empire and the eminent Governor of Madras
“If a good system of agriculture, unrivalled manufacturing skill, a capacity to produce whatever can contribute to either convenience or luxury, schools established in every village for teaching, reading, writing, and arithmetic, the general practice of hospitality and charity amongst each other, and above all, a treatment of the female sex full of confidence, respect, and delicacy, are among the signs which denote a civilized people – then the Hindoos are not inferior to the nations of Europe, and if civilization is to become an article of trade between England and India (India), I am convinced that England will gain by the import cargo.”
Quoted in Mill’s History, vol. i. p371, re-quoted by F Max Muller, p57, p231

You have read numerous testimonies to that effect in my prior work Arise Arjun: Awaken my Hindoo nation.

Over 99.99% Hindoos do not know till date (2004) that their glorious past had existed until 170 years ago. They also do not know that there was an ulterior motive behind methodically destroying their great civilization by the ChristianBritish. Hindoos generally think that today’s state of affairs had been around for a fairly long time, and nothing much can be done about it. If only they all knew, it was only 170 years, they would want to reverse it. But then, who will tell them? Those who have means to do so, won’t do that because it would clash with their vested interests. Their vested interests are now same as that of the ChristianBritish. They are products of that education system which ChristianBritish implemented 170 years ago. After ChristianBritish left BhaaratVarsh, they left their legacy back in form of these people.

Over 99.99% Hindoos do not know till date (2004) that their ancient Hindoo Education System was superior to Christian Missionary Education System, and their Hindoo Culture was superior to Christian Culture, as was unambiguously admitted by distinguished ChristianBritish people. If only they knew the truth, they would want to reinstate it. But then, Hindoos, for past six generations, have been fraudulently taught through Christian Missionary Education System that they had a rotten civilization, one ridden with meaningless rituals and superstitious traditions, and nothing worth being proud of. Products of that education system merrily keep parroting the same thing all over through mass media exposure and every other way.

A Civilization that had lasted 5,000 years, was destroyed within 112 years (1835-1947)

If you read numerous testimonies as reproduced in Arise Arjun: Awaken my Hindoo nation you would realize that Dharm' was reestablished after the battle of MahaaBhaarat. Even after 5,000 years, we see its reflection in Hindoo society. This, in itself, is the testimony that MahaaBhaarat was a necessity of the time.

This fact has been ignored generally, and rather too often references are made to MahaaBhaarat as if it were nothing but bloodshed. By doing so, we fail to appreciate its significance not only in national context but also in social context. It is important that now we relearn to look at things in perspective, and learn to understand the value of what should be valued or else we fail to derive its benefit.

The prime lesson that MahaaBhaarat teaches us is that we must not let Adharm' grow beyond limit, or else we pay the price for it! It also teaches that Adharm' must be resisted, fought, and eliminated.

This is where we were, only 170 years ago, not so long ago

“If a good system of agriculture, unrivalled manufacturing skill, a capacity to produce whatever can contribute to either convenience or luxury, schools established in every village for teaching, reading, writing, and arithmetic, the general practice of hospitality and charity amongst each other, and above all, a treatment of the female sex full of confidence, respect, and delicacy, are among the signs which denote a civilized people – then the Hindoos are not inferior to the nations of Europe, and if civilization is to become an article of trade between England and India (India), I am convinced that England will gain by the import cargo.”

This is where we have landed today

No sense of national pride (slowly returning but a long way to go). Looking up towards Christianized-West. A beggar on every street.

This is what happened in-between

Macaulay’s English Christian Missionary Education System was imposed upon us. Ancient Hindoo education system was wiped out systematically (a) by withdrawing all governmental support and by officially de-recognizing indigenous educational qualifications (ex: AyurVidya), (b) by inducing distrust towards indigenous knowledge base, in minds of children, using Christian missionary education system (ex: JyotirVidya).
Nation’s wealth was siphoned out systematically and fraudulently. Indigenous industries were methodically destroyed (ex: by cutting thumbs of weavers who made Dhaka Malmal, 40 yard sari could pass through one ring). Hindoo technology was systematically eliminated and Hindoo children were taught that no such technology ever existed. Hindoo children were taught to look down upon and distrust their heritage. Hindoo children never realized the conspiracy they were subjected to.

Was Britain essentially ChristianBritain?

Yes, we have dealt with this matter in detail in a subsequent chapter.

Was Macaulay’s Education System essentially a Christian Education System?

Yes, it was established and run by Christian missionaries. Macaulay himself had an undeniably Christian psyche.

What was the prime cause of our extraordinary downfall?

Our prolonged association with Christian missionary education system has been the prime cause of extraordinary downfall of Hindoo society. When I speak of downfall, I refer to ‘Where we were’ and ‘Where we have reached’ as described before.

What is the solution, if there is any?

Eliminate the root cause. Discard the Christian missionary education system. Reestablish Hindoo ancient education system, which had allowed Hindoo society to maintain extraordinarily high moral values, of which each and every visitor to BhaaratVarsh spoke of! Want more details? Please read my other works.

Understand the true motive behind Macaulay’s Education System

Macaulay proudly wrote his father in 1836: “Our English schools are flourishing wonderfully.... It is my belief that if our plans of education are followed up, there will not be a single idolater among the respectable classes in Bengal thirty years hence.”
Michel Danino, quoted by IndiaCause Newsletter dated August 17, 2003

Hindoos are idolaters, who worship idols, images of gods. Deuteronomy, the fifth book of Holy Bible, has its section 13 header titled as idolaters to be put to death. Bible pronounces death for Hindoo idolaters, Macaulay pronounces elimination of idolaters in a relatively more acceptable manner in today’s supposedly civilized world.

“We must at present do our best to form a class who may be interpreters between us and the millions whom we govern; a class of persons, Indians (Bhaaratiyas) in blood and color, but English in taste, in opinions, in morals and in intellect” as stated by Macaulay himself, quoted by Dr. NS Rajaram, p181

Hindoo society has remained Hindoo for name sake but a very large section thereof has been Christianized, not by religious conversion but by psyche conversion. Their thought process has been Christianized. Thus, body remains Hindoo but character becomes Christianized. The beauty is that many of them still think that they have Hindoo thought process. This is because they have lost the ability to distinguish between what is Hindoo thought process and what is Christian thought process. Just because they have leaning towards Hindooism they tend to think that they have Hindoo thought process.

Understand the effect of English language education on Hindoo psyche

This is what happens when we live with it for one generation.

“A single generation of English (note added: Christian) education suffices to break the threads of tradition and create a non-descript and superficial being deprived of all roots – a sort of intellectual pariah who does not belong to the East or the West, the past or the future. Of all Indian (Bhaaratiya) problems the educational is the most difficult and most tragic.” Dr. Ananda Coomaraswamy, quoted by Rajaram, p188

A healthy tree derives its life source from its roots. When the roots are rotten, the tree is no-more healthy. This is the state of Hindoo society today. Christian missionary education system has worked like pests and made the foundation hollow.

Look at statistics denoting the vast coverage of Christian Missionary Education in BhaaratVarsh

This is what we have lived with, for six generations, assuming that a new generation is ready in 25 years.

“It is estimated that 60 percent of all students in India (BhaaratVarsh) attend Roman Catholic schools and colleges.” [Ref.: Malachi Martin, The Jesuits] The real figure is much higher as this book was published over 15 years ago in 1987. They do not include non-Catholic educational institutions, which have proliferated in recent years with rapid spread of evangelical Protestant churches in India (BhaaratVarsh).” Ishwar Sharan, p123n

More significantly, 90 percent of those who formulate, administer and monitor national policies and practices are the ones who graduate from Christian educational institutions and FakeSecularist infected universities.

You must not refer to these three in isolation; referring to them in isolation dilutes your focus on the root cause

Macaulay’s education system
English language education
Christian missionary education

They are all connected by an invisible thread. Understanding that inter-relationship is key to the issue.

Introduce yourself to the children of Macaulay who come in different varieties

I am a Hindoo by accident used to say Jawaharlal Nehru, the first Prime Minister of independent India (BhaaratVarsh) from 1947 till his death, the founder of the Nehru dynasty from the clutches of which, we are still unable to come out!
I am born a Hindoo as a result of my sins during earlier births, wrote Motilal Nehru, the father of Jawaharlal Nehru, who was known to be a very wealthy person.

But all children of Macaulay need not be of that category. Two days ago, 76 years old AKDI (full name withheld) claimed that he was educated in Gujraati medium school, hence he was not a product of Macaulay education system. Simultaneously, he defended Macaulay conspiracy saying that British were the victors and it was natural that they imposed their education system on us. He said so after reading the 1st edition of this book. He summarily ignored that ChristianBritish did not implement Christian Missionary Education System on Hindoos in natural course. They did so when Macaulay warned them that they would never conquer this nation until they replaced Hindoo Ancient Education System and Hindoo Culture by Christian Missionary Education System and Christian Culture.

Why does AKDI knowingly ignore ChristianBritish motives behind their action? This is another type of Macaulay’s children. These are in vast majority today. As they do not find anything wrong in that action, even after they become aware of the motive behind such action, they will not want to do anything about reversing that action. Thus, the situation will remain as it is today.

While AKDI claims himself not to be a Macaulay product, he forgets that his present mind-set is not the result of his schooling alone. He did his college, university and IAS through Macaulay’s Christian Missionary education system. He lived and grew up in an environment that made him very much of a Macaulay product. And yet he happens to retain his Hindoo leanings because of his strong knowledge of Sanskrit, Hindi, Gujraati, Tamil and probably few other Bhaaratiya languages. Despite all this independence of thought that he claims, he defends ChristianBritish conspiracy, which led to substantial down gradation of this 5,000 year old civilization. This attitude of defending a wrong action will never let him get out of that mental slavery of which he is a prisoner.

Now, this must be understood clearly that I am not pointing at him as an individual. I mentioned his initials to let you know that the character I am referring to is not a creation of fiction. When I present you his example, I am speaking of most of you people who may be reading this book some day or other.

I am trying to make you aware of the fact that your thought process and your value system happens to be the product of the total environment that you are part of. I am using this term ‘environment’ in a fairly wider sense. The movies that you watch, the television serials that you enjoy, the books that you read, the newspaper and magazines you subscribe to, the friends and colleagues with whom you interact, your family with whom you live, everything is part of that environment.

The movie maker has something to say to you, that is his own thought process or belief system. He does not say to you this directly. He uses different casts in his story and he makes them deliver their dialogues. In those statements and emotions are hidden his own thought process and belief system. They influence you indirectly, often without even your knowing you.

I am doing the same thing here but with a basic difference in approach. I am being direct and thereby giving you an opportunity to either accept or discard it. But they, be they movie makers, be they television serial script writers or directors, be they news paper journalists or editors, or whatever, are not always being so direct.

Many a times they appear to be telling you only a story through their movie and consciously you think of it as a story only, but a lot of it leaves an impression on your mind, of which you are not consciously aware, and with time different belief system get cemented on your psyche.

Yesterday night (3 May 2004) a college day friend of mine called after 30 years. AC (full name withheld) got my number from a common friend AS. It was good to hear him. He told me that he had settled at a place called Pichhor in Madhya Pradesh. You may not have even heard the name of that place. I mention this, to make you realize that it is not a place big enough to be known by many, and certainly you cannot expect it to be an Westernized place. During the conversation he told me that he would now give the phone to his son and I could possibly give him some direction for life ( it is a Hindoo way of seeking advice from or blessings of elders). I spoke to his son in Hindi, which happened to be his mother tongue but not my mother tongue (In Canada, they call it your first language, not mother tongue; mother does not occupy such a significant place in their overall life system that they could ascribe their first language to their mother). Anyhow, returning to the base issue. Hindi wasn’t my mother tongue but knowing it was his, I spoke to him all the while in Hindi. What struck after I kept down the phone is that whatever little he spoke to me or responded to me was wholly in English! So, in a small place like Pichhor, the influence of English is no less than one’s mother tongue. I have noticed it rather too often that in most television talks the first time comers tend to respond in English to every question in Hindi thrown at them by the anchor. I thought initially that they all tried to impress that they knew English but gradually I tend to identify that English has spread its wings far and wide. Thus, plants have been separated from their roots!

Understand that Macaulay is no more your problem; your current problem is his legacy, the Christian Missionary Education System that envelopes you from all directions, and being missionary, it has a mission; that is to Christianize your psyche

Many of you are aware of Macaulay and the harm he did. Many of you even write in the magazines, newspaper articles about ill-effects of it. But always I see you all speaking of Macaulay, as if Macaulay was the real culprit. So, you have chosen your enemy and hitting at it. Your readers know that this ghostly character Macaulay, of whom he is hearing for the first time, or may be he has been hearing of him rather too often, in either case this guy is dead and gone. So why waste tears, forget him and go your way, continue with what you are doing. The problem is that you have made Macaulay as the hero or the villain or whatever.

In the process you are loosing sight of the fact that Macaulay by himself, or his so-called education system, or English education system, or whatever, all these identities are meaningless, because behind all these masks remain one and only one true identity, and that is the Christian Missionary Education System. Now, this being a missionary system, it has a mission. What is that mission? That is what you need to be fully aware of. That is to Christianize your psyche.

Why it is today so very necessary to understand the true face of Christianity, which happens to be very-very different from the masked one that you get to see generally

This Christian Missionary Education System springs from the very base of Christianity. It imbibes all qualities of Christian Faith, and it grows with Christian Traditions. Therefore, it becomes necessary that you understand Christianity’s in-born character better than you do now.
You aren’t able to see its true character because, enormous amounts of money are spent to keep a lid on it. To counteract any possible unwanted exposure, service-to-humanity-brand-religion-image is projected consistently.

Money and media power hide the Truth, our minds are pre-programmed through a methodical exposure to a make-believe world. You need to penetrate that mechanism and look beyond. Remember that the Truth often lies behind the Smoke Screen.

Let us familiarize ourselves with the Seed, the spread of Roots, the budding Plant, the grown-up Tree, and the attractive Garden of Christianity in its various phases of growth

Today we do not critically look at the Seed, nor we examine the Roots that remain under the Soil. Today we only look at the strong, powerful Tree that has spread its branches all over our existence, and effectively clouds our ability to look beyond.

The Seed is the Holy Bible. The Roots are the teachings of the Bible. The budding Plant is the effect of Teachings of the Bible on the ‘Past’ during formative years of Christianity, which are now historical facts. The Grown-up Tree is the effect of Teachings of the Bible on the ‘Present day’ world, and similarly the effect of Teachings of the Bible on the ‘modern USA’. And, much more in the titles that will follow...

The Seed and the Roots

Why is it so important to understand Bible? Why other sources are not dependable?

Christian Bible or the Holy Bible, as it is titled in print, comprises of the Old Testament and the New Testament. To understand Christianity, one must understand the so-called Holy Bible. Present day Christianity’s very foundation is based on the teachings in the Bible. Therefore, understanding the character of these teachings is a prerequisite for understanding Christianity.

It is no use attempting to understand Christianity based on television talks, church sermons, leaflets and propaganda materials. It is essentially a self-deceptive exercise, in vain.

Enormous amounts of money are spent every year for cosmetic purposes, the Vatican being the mammoth multinational organization having no parallel. We will provide you [in our works, at relevant places] with statistical data from dependable Christian sources [so you have no doubt about their validity] to demonstrate the enormity of such funding, which is used for face lifting on a regular pattern.

Any attempt to understand Christianity without understanding its Creed (as documented through the Holy Bible) would be a futile exercise. This is the reason that we chose to present the very first lesson of this book from the so-called Holy Bible itself.

Bible tells very clearly that Christian God is a Jealous God; can someone so jealous tolerate any other god? Christian God is revengeful, and he has his enemies!

Refer to Christian Bible, Exodus 20:5, 34:14 and Nahum 1:2, etc.
Is this description of the God or that of Satan?

Bible instructs Christians that those who try to convert you into another religion, kill them with your own hands, be they your own brother, your son, your daughter, your loving wife, or your friend

Refer to Christian Bible, Deuteronomy 13:6, 13:8, 13:9, 13:10, etc.
So, a Christian must stone to death someone who tries to convert a Christian into any other religion. How about applying the same law in reverse order to Christians? If a Christian wants to convert a person (who belongs to another religion, say, Hindooism) into Christianity then that Christian must be stoned to death. If this law were to be applied equitably (fairly and impartially), the first person to be stoned to death would be the Pope himself because he advocates all the time in favor of converting Hindoos into Christianity. Then all Christian missionaries would be stoned to death because they are all the while engaged in converting Hindoos in covert manner. These champions of Christianity must have a dose of their own medicine, shouldn’t they?

Bible instructs Christians that those who worship idols should be put to death

Deuteronomy 13 has been titled as “Idolaters to be put to death”. This indicates, all that has been said under section “13” apply to idolaters. In Christianity, a Hindoo is an idolater because he or she worships idols. Let us see what law has been pronounced for idolater Hindoos under Deuteronomy 13.

Bible instructs Christians to Kill every one, leave no one breathing; starve, burn, destroy, kill young men, virgins, babies sucking their mothers’ milk, and old men nearing their death; if you don’t believe me, please feel free to check Holy Bible for yourself, I am giving you here the references and verbatim quotes from Bible

Refer to Christian Bible, Deuteronomy 20:16,  20:17, 32:24, 32:25, etc.
How beautiful are these teachings, lovely aren’t they; so very compassionate! You are sure to attain God by following these teachings; won’t you? Have no doubts, ever! Would you call these exceptions? Don’t you see a systematic pattern all throughout? Do you want to see lot more of how these teachings have been implemented throughout the course of history with considerable zeal and dedication towards them? Have you started getting a feel of what an Aasuric culture means? By the way, does Hindooism teach you any thing like that?

Now, compare these teachings of Christian Bible with comparable teachings of Hindoo Manu Smriti, and experience the difference for yourself. Manu Smriti instructs the king not to use concealed weapons, barbed weapons, poisoned weapons, or weapons with blazing fire. It has to be man to man fight, battle of bravery and strength. And history is witness that this is what Hindoos followed. I am not talking about fake history that was rewritten by JNU (Jawaharlal Nehru University) and AMU (Aligarh Muslim University) Communist-Marxist historians and introduced in schools of India during Nehru dynasty

Manu: “The archetypal first man of Hindoo mythology, survivor of the great flood and father of the human race. He is also the legendary author of one of the most famous codes of the Hindoo law, the ManuSmriti [Laws of Manu], composed in Sanskrit.” Oxford Dictionary, p1127
Archetypal: “very typical of a certain kind of a person or thing.” Oxford Dictionary, p86
Hindoo Manu Smriti 7:90 “When a King fights with his foe in battle, he should not strike with weapons which are concealed, barbed, poisoned, or the points of which are blazing with fire” quoted by Prof. GC Asnani, p25

For Hindoos, technology was not meant for mass killing, and that is why, they did not develop gunpowder. A race that could develop the technology for creating an alloy, which could withstand tyranny of weather for many-many centuries without a trace of rusting, do you think that race could not have developed gunpowder and guns-cannons, the weapons of mass destruction using blazing fire? I am referring to the alloy used in that huge metallic tower (iron pillar) Garur Dhwaj, which stands close to Kutub Minaar of Delhi. On this tower, we find even today, Sanskrit inscription in Braahmi script (http://www.hindunet.org/hindu_history/modern/kutub_oak.html).

Hindoo Manu Smriti also instructs a king not to strike an enemy who is running away for life, one whom fear has engulfed, one who seeks pardon, one who surrenders, an eunuch, one who is in sleep, one who has lost his armor, one who is naked, one who is disarmed, one who is not taking part in the fight, one who is fighting with another person, one whose weapons are broken, one who is in sorrow, one who is very badly wounded, one who is terrified. Manu Smriti instructs Hindoo king to fight the battle of an honorable warrior, not of a savage one. For Hindoos, each day’s battle ended with sunset, and the next day’s battle began with the sunrise. Muslims and Christians did not fight a battle of honorable warrior.

Hindoo Manu Smriti 7:91 “Let the King not strike one who in flight and fear has climbed around, not a eunuch, nor one who joins the palms of his hands in supplication, nor one who flees with flying hair, nor one who sits down, nor one who says, “I am thine.” 7:92 Nor one who sleeps, nor one who has lost his coat of mail (armour), nor one who is naked, nor one who is disarmed, nor one who looks on without taking part in the fight, nor one who is fighting with another foe; 7:93 Nor one whose weapons are broken, who is afflicted with sorrow, who has been grievously wounded, who is terrified, nor one who is running away; he should remember the rule of conduct of an honorable warrior” quoted by Prof. GC Asnani, p25.
Coat of mail = a jacket covered with or composed of metal rings or plates, serving as armour, Oxford Dictionary, p351

Following this, Prithvi Raaj Chauhaan allowed another life to fleeing Mohammed Gori. That Gori, ungrateful, following barbaric Islamic laws returned, bribed JaiChand, and captured Prithvi Raaj Chauhaan and shoved fire rods into his eyes.

However, our ChristianizedHindoos (in other words, Hindoos raised by Christian education) fail to understand this, because what has clouded their mind and thought process is the Christian motto ‘Survival of the cunning’. Our ChristianizedHindoos have come to accept that concept as more important in life than being humans. Manu Smriti instructs you to behave like humans, not barbarians.

Present day Hindoos raised by Christianized education system are thoroughly ignorant of nobler Hindoo thought process, and they argue in favor of Christian ways. They need to ask themselves an honest question: had this world been a better place to live if Muslims and Christians fought by the code of conduct as instituted by Manu?

Here is an example. On 21 January 2004, I received a newsletter from IndiaCause of USA reproducing an article by some MM (full name withheld) Ph.D. talking of some ‘PrithviRaaj Syndrome’ describing it, as

“in the modern context, the defeat of PrithviRaaj Chauhaan in the hands of Muhammad Gori is one of being outwitted by an opponent. This eventual defeat was preceded by PrithviRaaj’s inability to understand the enemy and letting the enemy live to fight the other day on numerous (sic.) occasions.”

How Prithvi Raaj Chauhaan was to assume that he was dealing with a barbarian aasuric enemy? How was he to know what that barbarian’s barbaric religion had taught him?

Prithvi Raaj fought by Hindoo norms of the land. That enemy was on his knees, seeking pardon. That enemy was apparently in no condition to fight the valor of Prithvi Raaj. That enemy was running away for his life and his men’s lives.

Was Prithvi Raaj raised on barbaric principles that such enemy must be killed? Prithvi Raaj had not been taught the barbaric thought processes that other aasuric religions had evolved away from this Hindoo land. Why did our ChristianizedHindoo Ph.D. not come to teach Prithvi Raaj Chauhaan those barbaric laws of war that his enemy practiced? Where was then our ChristianizedHindoo Ph.D.? What is the point our wise-guy today sitting on judgment on the acts of Prithvi Raaj Chauhaan?

Does our ChristianizedHindoo Ph.D. not realize that world would have been a much better place to live if these Aasuric Religions were taught the laws of warfare according to Hindoo Manu Smriti? And, he looks down at them and names it Prithvi Raaj Syndrome!
Are these Christians and ChristianizedHindoos fit to pass value judgments on Hindooism? Are they worthy of sitting on judgment about Hindoos and Hindooism?

Is it not quite obvious that while Manu Smriti is civilized, compassionate and humane, the Bible is barbaric and aasuric?

Do yourself a favor and ask yourself a question, why did Christian missionaries malign Hindoo Manu Smriti so much? Was it out of a deep-rooted sense of insecurity that, if the two were to be compared on same footing, the Christian Bible would look like a creation of savage people of stone age, who never graduated from their animal instincts?

Aren’t animals far better? Animals certainly don’t rape women who worship other gods, but Bible teaches Christians to do that! Animals do not kill infants unless they are very hungry, and there are no grown ups left, but Bible teaches Christians to do that!

Great teachings, aren’t these? Your children will derive great moral values from those teachings of Christianity, won’t they? You should have as much Christian influence on your children as much as you can, shouldn’t you?

Isn’t it why you love to send your children to English-medium Christian schools, so that they can turnout to be good Hindoo born-Christian influenced citizens of the future? Would you think that time hasn’t yet come to review your preferences?

Now, let us see what Hindoo thinkers said, as opposed to Christian Holy Bible?

Why should I say, how great Hindooism is? Let someone else say it. Why should I defend my religion? Let a Christian defend it. Let us listen to a Christian say this:

“I have left to the last of the witness who might otherwise have been suspected – I mean the Hindoos themselves. The whole of their literature from one end to the other is pervaded by expressions of love and reverence for truth.” F. Max Muller, German Indologist and Professor at Oxford University, UK, p59

I need not defend Hindooism. Let Hindooism speak for itself! Come with me, and enjoy your journey...

Hindoo BhagavadGita said, God is equal to all, He has no favorites

Hindoo BhagavadGita 4.11 & 9.29 “Whoever, by whatsoever path approaches me, I accept him for his salvation. All creatures great and small – I am equal to all; I hate none, nor have I any favorites. Those who worship other Gods with devotion, worship me” reproduced Dr. NS Rajaram, p27

Hindoo Veds said, all paths lead to same God; this teaches us to respect other peoples’ gods

Hindoo RigVed I.164.46 “Cosmic reality is one, but the wise perceive it in many ways: As Indr, Mitr, Varun, Agni, mighty Garutmat, Yam, and Matarisvan – the giver of breath” reproduced Dr. NS Rajaram, p22
Hindoo Shivmahimna Stotr 3 (attributed to Gandharv Pushpdant) “As numberless rivers following different paths – straight or zigzag – merge in the same ocean, so too the aspirants of various tastes and capacities reach thee through effort” reproduced NS Rajaram, p27

Hindoo Veds said, let us not close our minds, let knowledge come to us from every source and inspire our intellect

Hindoo RigVed I.89.1 “Let felicitous thoughts come to us from every source” reproduced Dr. NS Rajaram, p26
Felicitous = (core sense) well chosen or suited to the circumstances; (subsense) pleasing and fortunate. Oxford Dictionary, p 673
Hindoo RigVed III.62.10 “Gaayatri Mantr: I pay homage to the supreme grandeur of the divine light, that it may inspire our intellect” reproduced Dr. NS Rajaram, p24

Hindoo Upanishads said, may God protect all, nourish all! May we be united and do well for humanity! May we never hate one another! May there be Peace Everywhere! May all be happy, healthy, no one suffer!

Hindoo Taittriya Upanishad, BrahmaValli & BhriguValli, Shaanti Mantr “May the Lord protect us together! May He nourish us together! May we work together uniting our strength for the good of humanity! May our learning be luminous and purposeful! May we never hate one another! May there be peace, peace, and perfect peace” reproduced Ravi Shankar, Chants of India
Hindoo Taittriya Aranyak, 4th Prashn, Pravargya Mantrs, 42nd Anuvaak “May there be peace on earth, peace in the ether, peace in the heaven, peace in all directions, peace in fire, peace in the air, peace in the sun, peace in the moon, peace in the constellations, peace in the waters, peace in the plants and herbs, peace in trees, peace towards cattle, peace towards goats, peace towards horses, peace towards mankind, peace in the absolute Brahm, peace in those who have attained Brahm, may there be peace, only peace. May that peace be in me, peace alone! Through that peace may I confirm peace in myself, and all bipeds, and quadrupeds! May there be peace in me, peace alone” reproduced Ravi Shankar, Chants of India
This is the central portion of the famous Mahaa Shaanti Mantr, the great prayer for peace. As well as the final Anuvaak of the Pravargya Mantrs, it is also the Shaanti mantr of the 5th Prashn of Taittriya Aranyak, which is the Brahmana for Pravargya.
Anuvaak = Subdivision of Ved, section, chapter. Vaman Shivram Apte, p23
Anuvaak = A chapter of the Ved, a subdivision or section. M. Monier-Williams, p38
Brahmana = Each of the four Veds has two distinct parts, Mantr and Brahmana; Mantr (words of prayer and adoration), Brahmana (directions for the details of the ceremonies at which the Mantrs were to be used and explanations…). M. Monier-Williams, p1015
Pravargya = A ceremony preliminary to the Som sacrifice. Vaman Shivram Apte, p368
Hindoo Sarve Shaam (the traditional prayer) “May good befall all! May there be peace for all! May all be fit for perfection, and may all experience that which is auspicious. May all be happy! May all be healthy! May all experience what is good and let no one suffer” reproduced Ravi Shankar, Chants of India

Hindoo Upanishads said, respect your mother, father, guru, and guest; follow only their faultless deeds, not their faulty deeds

Hindoo Taittriya Upanishad, ShikshaaValli, 10th Anuvaak “Do not neglect your duties to the gods and your ancestors. May your mother be like a god unto you! May your father be like a god unto you! May your Guru be like a god unto you! May your guest be like a god unto you! Wherever you have observed faultless deeds performed, you should follow those alone, and no others. When you have seen us, your teachers, perform good actions follow those alone” reproduced Ravi Shankar, Chants of India
Commonly known as ShishyaAnushaasanam', this section contains the final mantrs of instruction given by the guru to his students as they prepare to leave the Aashram and enter the life of a householder.

See the very difference between Hindoo thought process, and Christian thought process. Which one would you want your future generations to follow?

Hindoo Upanishads and Veds said, lead me from this transitory world to God; release me from the cycle of birth & death

Hindoo BrihadAranyak Upanishad, 1st Adhyaay, 3rd Brahmana, 28th Mantr “O Lord! Please lead me from the unreal to the real. Lead me from darkness to light. Lead me from death to immortality. May there be peace, peace, and perfect peace” reproduced Ravi Shankar, Chants of India

What is Real and Unreal?

Let me explain, in the context of this Mantr ‘unreal’ would mean transitory, and ‘real’ would mean permanent.

Let us understand it in this way: this world is transitory, whereas God is permanent. God existed before this world came into existence. God will exist after this world ceases to be in existence.

What is Immortality?

In the context of this Mantr ‘Immortality’ would mean freedom from the cycle of birth and death. Let me expand it further, if a person is not born, then s/he does not die. Our soul is not born again (encased in a body) after it dissolves in the Supreme Soul. That is what we call liberation or Moksh. Having attained Moksh, if we are not required to be born again, then we effectively become immortal. This is my simple understanding of the concept.

Hindoo RigVed, Taittriya Upanishad, Rudr mantr, 1st Kanda Mahaa Mrityunjaya Mantr “We worship Lord Shiv the three-eyed one, the one who is the master of all senses and qualities, and the one who is the sustainer of all growth. May he release us from the bondage of death as a ripened cucumber is released from its stalk, and may he (not deprive us of immortality) grant us immortality” reproduced Ravi Shankar, Chants of India

West has lot to learn from Hindooism but that can happen only when it is out of the suffocating grip of this Aasuric religion called Christianity!

I do not wish to define term Aasuric for my foreign readers, at this stage. It will come about, but in a later work. The idea is, to first present ample examples, so that readers themselves start getting a feel without my attempting to define it!

Now, let us come to the teachings of Jesus about which you could be carrying a totally different impression depending on what you may have read or what you may have been told, but believe me there is no better place to look for them than the Christian Bible itself, and then you should look for the reflection of those teachings in the real life conducts of Christian Popes, Saints, Cardinals, Archbishops, Priests

It would not be so easy for you to break through your preconceived notions about the Jesus Christ but we urge you to read what Jesus himself said, as documented by two of his chief disciples, and then think it over if you must carry on with your old impressions.

We will demonstrate the hidden truth in those statements by establishing that true Christians world over religiously followed those sayings of Jesus Christ.

Thus we would want to convey that there exists a definite correlation between the thought process of Jesus and his followers.

Apostle “Each of the twelve chief disciples of Jesus Christ. The twelve apostles were Peter, Andrew, James, John, Phillip, Bartholomew, Thomas, Matthew, James (the Less), Judas (or Thaddaeus), Simon, and Judas Iscariot. After the suicide of Judas Iscariot his place was taken by Matthias.” Oxford Dictionary, p 77

They had themselves heard the Jesus, as the saying goes, coming from the horse’s mouth, leaving no scope for doubt. They independently documented the sayings of Jesus, as they heard him say from time to time. Let us look at the documentation as to what Jesus taught or intended to teach the mankind.

St. Luke “An evangelist, closely associated with St. Paul and traditionally the author of the third Gospel and the Acts of the Apostles, Feast day, 18 October.” Oxford Dictionary, p 1099

Jesus threatened of eternal damnation to all those who did not agree with him

“Jesus was the first religious teacher in history to threaten those who did not agree with him with eternal damnation. This is the only original idea that he contributed to the world’s vast body of religious thought, and in two millennia it has destroyed nations and whole civilizations and caused Thomas Jefferson to declare, ‘The Christian God is cruel, vindictive, capricious and unjust’.” Ishwar Sharan, p120
Damnation = condemnation to eternal punishment in hell.
Eternal = lasting or existing forever; without end or beginning.
Capricious = given to sudden and unaccountable changes of mood or behavior.
Unjust = not based on or behaving according to what is normally right and fair.
Vindictive = having or showing a strong or unreasoning desire for revenge. Oxford Dictionary, p463, p631, p271, p2024, p2062

Jesus wanted War NOT Peace, he said it without any ambiguity, but Christians don’t tell you that, so check their Holy Bible, here is the reference and verbatim quote

Refer to Christian Bible, Matthew 10:34, etc.

Jesus wanted Division NOT Peace, he said so without any ambiguity, but Christians don’t tell you that, so check their Holy Bible, here is the reference and verbatim quote. Also think, from where did Christians learn the Divide and Rule Policy!

Refer to Christian Bible, Luke 12:51, etc.

Do Christian missionaries tell you what was the true agenda of Jesus? Do you realize how Christians learned the Divide and Rule policy? They learned it from their messiah.

Jesus wanted Fire, Sword, War NOT Peace, he wanted each house Divided, Father against Son and Son against Father; he said so without any ambiguity, here is the reference and verbatim quote. Also think, why do we have now broken families every where around?

Refer to Gospel of Thomas 16, etc.

Jesus Christ did succeed in bringing upon earth fire and sword. Here is an example. The scene is Christianized India.

“New Delhi: Guns, knives, and hockey sticks - the list of new additions to school bags is endless. If one were to go by the findings of a recent survey, which brings out the startling fact that more and more of school going children are carrying weapons with them, reports PTI. ... According to Dr. Ravi Prakash Gupta, pediatrician and project coordinator, Sahyog, 61 out of 850 students surveyed admitted carrying weapons like gun, knife, stick or hockey stick to educational institutions and as many as 80 adolescents said they were threatened or injured by someone with a weapon in the past 12 months.” The Free Press Journal, 1 April 2004, front page bottom

Do Christian missionaries tell you, when they want to convert you into Christianity that Jesus Christ himself said, without any ambiguity, that he came to this earth to create hatred amongst family members? Do you now see who is the Kali (‘a’ pronounced as in ‘rural’ not as in ‘arm’) who brought in Kali Yug? If you wish to avoid the evil, you must have the ability to identify it. Do you now realize why we have broken families all over?

Ask yourself, why do we search for Peace today so badly? Why, in earlier days, humanity did not crave for peace so much? What went wrong with the advent of Christianity and Islam?

Why people speak of peace so much today? Is it because peace is not there! Aasuric religions like Christianity and Islam have practiced so much of mass killing over past 2,000 years that people are today gasping for breath and starving for peace.

Why people did not speak of peace so much in earlier days? Was it because there was peace! So, there was no need for so much talk. Civilized religion like Hindooism had taught that unwarranted killings are no good.

Hindooism taught that you must defend yourself but must not kill for killing. But this Christianity, through its Christian education system taught Gandhi, Nehru and the like the opposite, who in turn misguided Hindoos. Gandhi taught Hindoos that they should give up their right to self-defense [see Arise Arjun awaken my Hindoo nation]. Nehru taught Hindoos that they were a worthless lot [see Chapter-2 and my subsequent works]. Net result, Hindoos went into Coma!

Jesus wanted Enmity amongst family members, he said so without any ambiguity; he wanted man’s own family as his enemy, he wanted son against father, he wanted daughter against mother, he wanted daughter in law against mother in law. Do Christian missionaries tell you that? No, they don’t. So check their Holy Bible, here is the reference and verbatim quote. Also, think why do we have so many disturbances within each family itself !

Refer to Christian Bible, Matthew 10:35, 10:36, etc.

Jesus wanted the institution of family destroyed threadbare, he wanted every house divided, he wanted father against son, he wanted son against father, he wanted mother against daughter, he wanted daughter against mother, he wanted mother in law against daughter in law, he wanted daughter in law against mother in law. He said so in simple language, so don’t find excuses with interpretation! He said so without any ambiguity, so don’t try to find another clever interpretation. He used simple English a child would understand, so don’t play with words. It is crystal clear but Christians don’t tell you that, so check their Holy Bible, here is the reference and verbatim quote. You must realize one fundamental truth: if you are going to respect evil, you will turn evil yourself in a matter of time. And that is precisely what has happened. Remember that evil gradually destroys good, if good does not try to protect itself

Refer to Christian Bible, Luke 12:52, 12:53, etc.

Why today there is so much discord in each family? This is because, you learn to live in accordance with the values you come to respect. You don’t have to preach those values, your conducts themselves reflect the values you have come to adopt.

Jesus makes it pretty clear that you must learn to hate your father, mother, brothers, and sisters if you want to be his disciple. He does not mince words. He does not say things indirectly. He says it straight and simple

Refer to Gospel of Thomas 56, etc.

Naturally, Christian children cannot be expected to do any better. By the time they grow up and become financially independent they have hardly any respect or compassion left for their parents. Children leave parents no sooner than they become sixteen and often care not, and parents are also becoming pretty much the same. No wonder Christian societies of the West witness disintegrating family system so quickly!

Now see the effect of teachings of Jesus on present day Hindoo society

Hindooism taught and practiced the opposite for thousands of years. But now, with many generations of predominant Christian education system prevailing in India, our Hindoo society has been showing the very similar destructive tendencies. Such is the effect of bad company for too long.

Our Hindoo children are becoming ‘Christianized’ but we think they are becoming ‘Westernized’. When we identify the cause with a wrong name we go looking for solution at wrong places!

We do not realize that Western is essentially Christian [see Chapter-4]. And Christianity is based on hatred. But by false propaganda, they have made us believe that Christianity is based on peace, love and service to humanity [see Chapter-2].

They have a reason to do so. They know it too well that if the true face of Christianity is in the out, people would simply kick it away. To keep the mass appeal they put a mask but they carry on with their real plans. It is you who is fooled.

Jesus said let rich and powerful become richer and more powerful; let poor and weak become poorer and weaker

Refer to Gospel of Thomas 42, etc.

That is precisely what Christian nations had been doing all the while. How else ChristianBritish became rich? Naturally at the cost of all those countries they colonized. How else today’s predominantly Christian America maintains its economic supremacy? Naturally by selling arms and ammunitions to third-world countries, creating animosity amongst them through undercover operations, keep them fighting, and eyeing for Iran Iraq’s oil-wealth.

Jesus wanted to turn a Woman into a man because only then she could go to heaven

Gospel of Thomas 112 “Simon Peter said to them: Let Mariham go away from us. For women are not worthy of life. Jesus said: Lo, I will draw her so that I will make her a man so that she too may become a living spirit, which is like you men; for every woman who makes herself a man will enter into the kingdom of heaven.” Quoted by Ishwar Sharan, n76

Jesus says that he would turn a woman into a man so that she too can become a living spirit. In other words, a woman is not a living spirit - she is probably a ghost?

Who was Saint Thomas?

“An Apostle; known as Doubting Thomas. He earned his nickname by saying that he would not believe that Christ had risen again until he had seen and touched his wounds (John 20:24-9).” Oxford Dictionary, p1928

Perhaps Thomas knew Jesus better or else, he would not have doubted Jesus’ ability to rise from the grave. He must have known, what Jesus really was, and what he was truly capable of. World today has been fooled, but Thomas was probably not.

Do you find it pretty difficult to believe all this stuff? I wouldn’t have believed all this a year ago because then I hadn’t checked the Bible myself. You can check Bible for yourself because I have given in this book all references with each quote from Jesus

It is very much possible that you may find hard to digest many of such evidences that I shall produce gradually, because your mind has been preprogrammed by massive propaganda that Christianity is a religion of peace and love, and service to the humanity.

This image building had been necessary to cover up the real face of their operations worldwide, particularly in third-world countries.

Enormous amounts of money have gone into that face-lifting operation and you will know of its magnitude from the statistics that we will reproduce from authentic Christian sources. Today, you do not have to purchase the mass media. All you have to do is to hire an advertising position, or rent a time slot in a television channel and broadcast all that you need. Media is in the business to sell. Christianity is in the business to buy, the way they buy new Christians from poor segments of the society. These segments have been made poor by Christianity’s cunning maneuvers. You will learn about them through my works.

Demolishing your pre-conceived notions is the first necessity; only thereafter, your vision will penetrate through the smoke screen, and only then, you will be able to look beyond.

Whatever you have read so far, would you call them Divine teachings or, barbaric teachings? It is for you to decide!

Now you need to see how well those teachings have percolated down to the real-life conducts of Christian Popes, Christian Saints, Christian Cardinals, Christian Archbishops, and conducts of Christian Converts from Hindooism. Such is the powerful magic of Christian thought process!

All you need to do is to continue the journey with me through the pages of this work, and other works to follow soon, in print ... This ‘one work’ alone may be inadequate to tear off the mask!

The budding Plant

Christianity began with the motive of Imperialism, much later it covered its face with the mask of service-to-humanity-brand religion

“Christianity, and especially Roman Christianity, has very little to do with religious faith. It is, and has always, been a system of imperialist politics and financial racketeering practiced under the guise of religion.” Ishwar Sharan, pp 121-122

Find hard to believe? Naturally, I could not blame you. Our mind has been pre-programmed by false propaganda. Much the same way they turn people Communist, by filling their heads from the very childhood, calling untruth as truth. First let us establish that it is so, and then we will tell you, in one of our subsequent publications, how the whole process of camouflage began.

Let us see how this definition fits Christianity? For that, first we need to critically examine:

Imperialism “A policy of extending a country’s power and influence through colonization, use of military force, or other means.” Oxford Dictionary, p916

Let us see how Christianity established itself by use of Military Force. For that, let us look at the life and conduct of 1st Pope of Christianity, some 1,700 years ago.

Let us see how Christianity spread its wings through Colonization. For that, let us look at the life and conduct of Pope Alexander VI (1492-1503) of Christianity.

Let us see how Christianity continues to spread its wings by Other Means. For that, let us look at the Christianity’s Postwar World Policy extracted from Christian sources [see Vol. 2]

Colonize “(of a country or its citizens) send a group of settlers to (a place) and establish political control over it.” “Come to settle among and establish political control over (the indigenous people of an area).” “Appropriate (a place or domain) for one’s own use.” Oxford Dictionary, p361
Politics “The activities associated with the governance of a country or area, especially the debate or conflict between individuals or parties having or hoping to achieve power.” “Activities within an organization which are aimed at improving someone’s status or position and are typically considered to be devious or divisive.” Oxford Dictionary, p361

My present and future works will provide you with ample testimony of:

But, it will be a very different perspective than that we are so much used to hearing and reading so often. In my own special way, I shall try to help you understand clearly the validity of the definition given by Ishwar Sharan.

Breaking myths and destroying preconceived notions is my objective in writing these books. These notions are the result of a systematic pre-programming of Bhaaratiya psyche, which has been achieved through a tenacious effort over the past few centuries. As it happens with every Aquarian effort, the effect of these writings will not be felt soon. It will take many years before the truth in these statements will become fully visible to the masses.

Please click here for access to complete text

2010 10 18 
I could have reproduced hundreds of relevant quotes from Christian Bible to substantiate my point. But that would have amounted to cataloguing which could be good for reference but not good enough for assimilating the truth that deludes you most. Therefore, I have chosen to pick up, at random, a set of few quotes and attempted at explaining far-reaching consequences they hold in store for us. I have tried to explain them differently, from different angles, so that you acquire an understanding that is deep and wide. Besides, the style it has been explained should help you assimilate the core issues with relative ease. Those who are interested in large number of quotes for cataloguing purpose may want to refer to other peoples' works. My work essentially attempts at helping you with a vision that penetrate the smoke screen and look beyond.

Archived

Lessons before you proceed
Curtain Raiser
The Seed and the Roots
The budding Plant
Complete text
Quoted References / Bibliography / Publication history