Arjun’s Concerns about the deterioration of the eternal Family-Dharm' — Shlok' 40-43 (continued)

On importance of Pedigree

Is pedigree important for pet animals but not for humans?

When rich people buy a puppy they check the pedigree. When European dairy farms buy cows and bulls they check the pedigree. So, the record of ancestors, genealogy is important when it comes to buying an animal but it seems a matter of least interest when it comes to humans.

Is the quality of next generation important for pet animals but not for humans?

While mating two animals the pedigree becomes relevant even today so that the next generation is equally good if not better. But it seems that when humans mate and produce children the next generation is not so important. Therefore, they do not care to look at the pedigree.

A little knowledge is always very dangerous

It all started in BhaaratVarsh with the spread of ChristianEnglish education system. Two thousand year old Christianity is so very ignorant of the laws of the Nature and like fools they always try to conquer the Nature. When Christian Missionary Educators saw Hindus having a very sophisticated system of applied mathematics to human lives they simply could not make head or tail out of it. Such high Mathematics was not for those whose evolution was yet at so lowly level.

Immense harm they have done by imposing their ignorance

Pampering their immensely inflated ego they thought that they were a superior race, and like all fools do they too simply condemned Hindu system as nothing but superstition. And with that they passed on their own ignorance and lack of understanding to Hindu children whom they taught for six generations after systematically eliminating ancient Hindu education system.

Importance of marriages in the same Varn

Hindu social structure placed high degree of importance to marriages among likes to strengthen offspring of like qualities. For instance, a Kshatriya would be married to a Kshatriya so that the children born are with the qualities of Kshatriya and each new generation of newborns is geared to fulfill its social obligations well when they grow up, as expected of a Kshatriya.

Maintaining self-reliance and equilibrium

Thus, Braahman, Kshatriya, Vaishya and Shoodr all have their respective responsibilities towards the society’s needs and its equilibrium, and thus, self-reliance is maintained within the society by adequate supply and training of necessary skills.

Self-governance was the key

The society lived in small units of villages and each village would be self-sufficient towards its needs without requiring migration from one to the other. It also maintained the safety and ethical norms within the commune. Each village would thus be self-governed as had been witnessed by Colonel Sleeman as late as in 19th century. (Seed-2)

Comparative scenario

In that social structure of yesteryears we did not have (a) hypocrisy as rampant as is today in modern Christianized urban society, (b) lack of security needing excessive, and unduly expensive, security measures as it is today (Seed-5), and (c) total lack of moral values as compared to the Hindu society of olden days.

In today’s Christianized societies, there is no doubt lot of talk about morality, but little in evidence in reality. Probably, so much talk about morality is necessitated by the stark absence (Seed-5) of it in conducts of the people.

Today we look down upon the olden day social structure, and gloat upon the beauties of present day social structure; but if only we had learned to be honest to ourselves, we would realize how low we have drooped down. Unfortunately, our ego is so blinding that we fail to see the truth in Max Muller’s words when he says:

"If you approach the Hindus with such feelings, you will teach them neither rectitude, nor science, nor literature. Nay, they might appeal to their own literature, even to their law-books, to teach us at least one lesson of truthfulness, truthfulness to ourselves, or, in other words, - humility".

Hotchpotch ruins Social Economics

With mixed-Varn children we have new generations of undefined social characteristics and social responsibilities. Kshatriya-Shoodr, Vaishya-Kshatriya, Shoodr-Braahman children would not know which direction of social training and responsibility they need to take up.

Lesser-acknowledged Truth

As a result, today Christian countries (like USA, Canada) face acute shortage of people willing to take up lower-end jobs, and these societies have been forced to depend on immigrants, and that in turn, has raised issues relating to racial discrimination and deep discontentment among new immigrants until they somehow settle down.

And who points finger at whom?

Racial discrimination nevertheless remains alive deep into the system and only victims know it too well though not acknowledged by these Christian societies for they are trained to maintain a positive face before others.

And these are the people who talk of social discrimination in olden day society, forgetting that those societies were essentially village-based societies with less than thousand people in a habitat, and migration was not called for.

Not long ago but only 123 years ago

Following was the situation only 123 years ago [1882] and that too after the ChristianBritish had substantially messed up our social structure. Try to visualize what would have been the situation before ChristianBritish messing up the village-based social structure. As Max Muller quotes (ISBN 0-14-100437-1 p.230 n.14) from Times 14 August 1882:

"I see from Dr Hunter’s latest statistical tables that the whole number of towns and villages in British BhaaratVarsh amounts to 493,498. Out of this number 448,320 have less than 1000 inhabitants, and may be called villages. In Bengal, where the growth of towns has been most encouraged through Government establishments, the total number of homesteads is 117,042 and more than half of these contain less than 200 inhabitants. In the Northwestern Provinces the last census gives us 105,124 villages, against 297 towns".

So we had a wonderful village-based social structure just 123 years ago, and the ChristianBritish destroyed that and imposed on us their yet-evolving highly defective urban Christianized social structure to fulfill their stupid ego and their Messiah’s ignoble plans (see earlier part of this book).

On purpose of Varn' Vyavastha (so-called Caste System)

There would be No need for migration, like today

Braahman, Kshatriya, Vaishya and Shoodr are 4-Varn that Bhagawaan Shri Krishn spoke about. There was a definitive purpose behind 4-Varn System in Hindu society. Necessary occupational training would come from the family itself, and each ancient Hindu village would be self-dependent. There would be No need for migration, like today; self-sufficiency and self-dependence would be the motto of Hindu 4-Varn System.

Necessary occupational training would come from the family itself

Braahman parents would provide the child with an environment to grow up as teachers to the society. Kshatriya parents would provide the child with an environment to grow up as protectors of life and land of the society. Vaishya parents would provide the child with an environment to grow up as suppliers of necessities of life to the society. Shoodr parents would provide the child with an environment to grow up as provider of all services to the society.

Self-sufficiency & self-dependence of each village unit

The necessary training that each would receive would come from the family itself. For instance, son would learn necessary skills from his father. The system would operate in a cyclic pattern from one generation to other. The necessary training would be passed on from one generation to another, by father to the son, and thus ensure continuity of self-sufficiency and self-dependence of each village unit.
Self-sufficient in education, administration, supplies and services

The Hindu society would live in small units called villages, and each village would be self-sufficient in respect of its needs with regard to its education, administration, supplies and services. Towns would be few, and the number of those living in towns would be minuscule in comparison to the whole nation.

To ensure that, each village administration would be self-sufficient and self-dependent ~ it would have Braahman priests and teachers, Kshatriya administrators and defenders, Vaishya producers and agriculturists, and Shoodr service providers with all types of artisans. Max Muller has documented (ISBN 0-14-100437-1, p.255):

"The village communities are composed of those who cultivate the land, the established village-servants, priest, blacksmith, carpenter, accountant, washer-man (whose wife is ex officio midwife of the little village community), potter, watchman, barber, shoemaker, etc".

There would be no need for migration of people from one village to another, except by marriages. Thus, women would come from nearby villages, while sons would remain on the soil. For instance, in ancient Hindu society, a child of a barber would learn necessary skills from his father watching his father do the job when the child comes up a certain stage.

Compare this with American/European Christian societies

American/European Christian societies do not believe in this system. As a result, if you want to become a barber in Canada, you have to go to a school and pay fees (year 1996) CA$ 6,000 (Rs 1,80,000) to become a barber!

In the process you make other guy’s living so very expensive and call it "High Standard of Living"!

Thus, Hair cutting schools would have made their share of money, and their business would flourish. Having paid such a hefty fees to qualify as a barber (you cannot become a barber otherwise), you will naturally squeeze your customers accordingly. He would pay CA$ 10-15 (Rs 300-450) for a haircut to begin with for an ordinary haircut in an ordinary saloon. Thus, you make the living of the other person so very costly, and call it high standard of living!

Masking weakness and fooling the world

It is the specialty of the Christian World to mask their weaknesses with respectable sounding names such as: "High Standard of Living (ordinary people earn so well)" or "Dignity of Labor (even a barber earns so much)" which would really mean "Robbing each other for no good reason". They make such big show of everything and that doesn’t end with the example of, as ordinary a skill, as that of a barber.
And when the poor barber cannot make a living on this then he upgrades himself to a so-called "Professional". Then he begins to advise his customers of hundred different ways in which the heads can be shaved. This catches the fancy of school kids even as low as 8-10 year old. Each kid will come to school with a different kind of shave on his head, then each one would envy each other, and next month it would be each one’s turn to get yet another design on their head. In the process, poor parents would have holes in their pockets, working harder for their expensive kids.

When as an adult you go to the office, and suppose you had a hair cut, immediately you would be greeted with the comment "Nice Hair Cut". You will feel pleased at the greeting and next month you would again plan a different kind of hair cut. If you happen to be in the prime of your youth, or if you are single (which most people are in any case disregard their age factor) you will have further encouragement from your so-called professional barber to get your hair painted in one color in one month and then in another color the next month - as if you are fit for display at a Zoo. So much so for the professionalism in every discipline (not only for barbers) which is spreading its wings fast throughout today’s globalized world of Christian influence, including that of ours.

And it has led them to such a pathetic situation...

In North America today, it is so very difficult to find Braahman equivalents (teachers) and Shoodr equivalents (other service providers) in sufficient numbers. So, they have to ask people from other countries to come in and do those jobs. The economies of these countries would flop without these immigrants. For instance, Canada’s Ontario province [state capital Toronto] had been in deep red for long. They came out of it only in year 2000 when they had first time a surplus budget after long. This has been possible only after massive induction of foreign migrants in human form and their lifesaving hard cash, which came with them while migrating.

Such is the ill-conceived social system of the proud Christian World

Such is the dependence on others on account of a faulty social system of which they are quite proud. Besides, there is no true respect for teachers as compared to ancient Hindu Varn system, and that happens to be another aspect of this ill-conceived Christian social system, which makes teachers not worthy of that kind of respect.

Abbe Dubois on so-called Caste System

"They (Europeans) believe that nothing else is good which is not included in the polity and government of their own country and consider customs different from their own as uncivilized and ridiculous. They consider the caste system as ridiculous and one which brings more trouble and disorder in the population.
For my part having lived many years and being able to study their life and character I have arrived at opposite discussion (sic.). I believe caste division is the happiest effort of Hindu legislation. It is solely due to this, that people in BhaaratVarsh did not lapse into barbarism and preserved art and sciences of civilization while most other nations of the earth remained barbaric. The overall result of caste system far outweighs any deficiency.
A certain general uniformity in everyday social matters compels one to look upon the different masses as belonging to one big family.
No person can exercise two professions at a time. Each caste has its own rules and regulation even pertaining to cut and color of clothes, style of wearing them, types of jewellery worn and specific ceremonies during childbirth, marriage and funeral. Even if such customs are in direct opposition with other castes there is toleration. They have to marry in their own caste, even to the sub division to which they belong. If one faction trespasses the rights of others, it may even result in bloody conflict.
Caste assigns to each individual his own profession handed down from generation to generation. It was a most clear-sighted prudence to maintain a state of civilization. Where the population is not bound by duty and rules of caste, they abandon themselves to their natural propensity and lapse into barbarism.
The legislators of BhaaratVarsh were too wise and well acquainted with the natural character of the people and prescribed laws without leaving to the discretion of each individual to do as per his own family. The provisions readily imposed social fabric to hold together. In fact, nothing is left to chance. Everything is laid down by rule and the customs are considered inviolable. In fact, a shame would fall and reflect on the entire caste if the fault of one individual went unpunished. The caste will execute justice and defend its own honor and keep all its members within bounds of duty." Abbe Dubois, Hindu Manners and Customs, quoted in ISBN 81-7835-100-5, pp.61-62

Abbe Dubois toured extensively Southern BhaaratVarsh in early 19th century (1792-1823). Please pay attention to the dates. It was prior to 1835. After that arrived battalions of Christian Missionaries and opened their "shops" under guise of missionary schools. Their titles Bishop/Archbishop very aptly include the word "Shop" in it. That has been their main job all along.

"Essentially being a missionary, he ridiculed Hindu customs and practices by observing these superficially and expressing his desire thus
"Ultimately the Hindu will open his eyes to the light and tear himself away from his dark superstitions. A day will come when the standard of the Cross will be flying over the temples of India". It may be questioned as to why importance is being given to the views of such a prejudiced person. But Dubois perhaps is the only Westerner who has studied the caste system exhaustively for 30 years. And even with his prejudice if he finds something highly useful, it becomes even more convincing" ISBN 81-7835-100-5, p.61

On rigorous life cycle of a Braahman born

Brahm’Charya

Braahman born would be required to undertake a disciplined life style. First 25 years of Braahman’s life would be spent in total celibacy (Brahm’Charya). He would be engaging himself, during this period of his life, in pursuit of knowledge. He would later be required to fulfill the role of the teacher and a guide to the society.

Grihasth

Next 25 years of Braahman’s life would be spent in family life (Grihasth). His being in the family life would have a very definitive purpose in social context. He would be meeting his responsibility towards the society in giving it, its next generation. Children of next generation would be carrying on the tradition after he is gone.

Vaan’Prasth'

Following 25 years he would spend in the woods (Vaan’Prasth) living close to the Mother Nature. The solitude this would provide, would not allow him day-to-day contact with children and household affairs. During this period, he would be gradually learning to detach him self from worldly affairs. With that, he would also be getting a taste of the world away from this world.

Sannyaas

Remaining part of his life would be spent in total abandonment of worldly ties, Sannyaas. His sole occupation would be to focus his mind only on to the God. His preparation for the journey towards God would begin in full faith and consistency. This would allow a Braahman born to graduate towards the higher ends of earthly life through the course of numerous births, if he is able to maintain the sanctity of Braahman birth through his thoughts and actions.

Varn of the Family of your subsequent births will depend on...

If a Braahman born is not able to maintain the sanctity of Braahman birth through his thoughts and actions throughout his lifetime then he goes back the ladder as many steps as his thoughts and actions have earned him. This is where the concept of accumulated deeds comes into play. The deeds can take him back many steps even down to the Shoodr stage depending on the nature of his deeds. The Varn of the Family of your subsequent births will depend on your acquired traits and accumulated deeds of earlier births.

ChristianEnglish education system has taught us...

ChristianEnglish education system has taught us Hindus for past six generations that there is no rebirth. The man is born only once and after that he goes either to heaven or to Hell and lives there forever until eternity. He goes to heaven if was born a Christian or if he has adopted Christianity during his lifetime because Jesus is the Sole redeemer of the humanity. If the person was born not as a Christian and not adopted Christianity during his lifetime then he goes to Hell and lives there till eternity. Every Christian born or Christian convert is duty bound to convert all heathens into Christianity out of their sheer love for humanity, as they cannot bear the thought of so many heathens burning in Hell Fire till eternity!

Heathens - example the Hindus

Heathens, according to dictionary definition, are those who are not Christian, Jew, or Muslim. They are follower of a polytheistic religion, for instance, the Hindus. They are the unenlightened people regarded as lacking culture or moral principles. This dictionary definition tells you how you are placed in comparison to Christians, Jews, and Muslims. If you have any misgivings about your standing in their eyes, at least, do not keep fooling yourself that all are equal. And, of course, it is them—the Christians—who decide that if a Hindu follows Varn System then he is essentially doing a great injustice to humanity but if he is born as a Christian or becomes a converted Christian then he is beyond any such stigma.

No such rigor for Kshatriya, Vaishya, Shoodr born

Those born in other three Varn(s) would not be required to undergo the rigors that were expected of the Braahman Varn. They could live their whole life within the social framework and continue to enjoy the family life until death, unless an individual decided otherwise for himself.

Kshatriya born would be required to undergo training of a warrior and would be expected to participate in protection of the nation, human lives and wealth, social justice and administration. Their natural inclination would be towards organizing, managing, maintaining, politics, and ruler-ship.

Vaishya born would be required to undergo training in agriculture, manufacture and trade. They would engage themselves in cultivation of agriculture and manufacture of other produces that would be necessary for sustaining life on the earth. They would have natural aptitude for trade and commerce.

Shoodr born would be required to undergo training in meeting all other needs for the society. They would naturally gravitate towards service and labor. They would provide other services needed by Braahman, Kshatriya, Vaishya Varn, as well as Shoodr Varn.

The basics before you proceed

25-10-2007

There is something you may want to understand well before you proceed any further. If your slate/page is full you won't have any place to write on it until you clean it up well. Similarly, your mind, your thoughts, your emotions —almost your whole being—is covered with a blanket. This blanket is made of primarily three components - your religion, your education system and media around you. Using (or abusing) the Media (the immensely powerful tool that it is) you are constantly being bombarded with what you should know. These invisible shackles are too demanding to let you loose.

You may think that you are free to form your independent opinion—almost about anything—but the truth happens to be otherwise. You are also constantly reminded that you are making an informed choice but the reality is opposite. You never realize that you are always being fed with selective information. Your religious guides tell you what they want you to know. Much the same is the case with your educators and your media. Your psyche formation —right from your childhood through adolescence to the adulthood—takes place under their guidance. And, my objective is to break that cordon of cultivated misinformation, and the resultant ignorance.

When an Untruth is repeated thousand times it begins to sound like truth. When it is repeated hundreds of thousands of time it becomes The Truth, and the real truth becomes the Untruth. Your school textbooks are the best tool to achieve this fete. From the very childhood your brains are washed thoroughly leading you to a make believe world of which you have no direct experience because it relates to that Past where "you" were not Present!

Your direct experiences of today (if any) are projected as the direct outcome of that remote past of which you have no true experience, except whatever you may have been told via your textbooks, your religious guides, and media stories. Guides of organized religions have their own agenda that itself guides their thought and action, and based on that they guide the thoughts and actions of their followers. Contents of educational textbooks and media coverage get widely influenced by the images that their religious guides have helped them form over generations. If there remains any question of doubt it is duly taken care of by those who control things from behind the scene, the very support system which regulates breathing of educational institutions and media outlets (that is the inflow of finances and the power centers).

The repetition which has carefully shaped the untruth as truth can only be neutralized by equal amount of repetition. And therefore, you must not frown upon any repetition in my works, though they are often not verbatim repetitions. You may as well enjoy reading them.

On gross social injustice in form of caste system

Some of you may have read Seed-2 and some of you may not have. I receive plenty of feedback from my readers and I know that most often people do not get on hand the first book first. They get at random one of the books from someone and start reading it. It simply does not happen that they have access to all my works so that they can read them sequentially. Hence, those who have not read Seed-2, for them, the following section will be helpful. And for those who may have read Seed-2, for them, it may serve as recapitulation. Some arguments may be common with Seed-2 and some not—to support the same case a different logic may have been used.

When you think of Caste system you think of gross social injustice towards a very large section of Hindu society. And Hindu Braahman is said to be the main culprit behind this injustice. This theory has been so well propagated that people today simply find no need to apply their mind. Just like any other superstition or blind faith they believe in this theory. Whenever any such propaganda driven theory is popularized with purpose, there is always some hidden beneficiary. Who all were those—that I have discussed elsewhere—I wouldn’t want to get sidetracked here—so let us stick to the point.

Hindu society’s foundation was based on 4-Varn System: Braahman, Kshatriya, Vaishya, and Shoodr Varn. 16th century Christian missionaries coined a new term for this: Caste system. 19th century fiercely-Christian T B Macaulay introduced Christian Missionary driven English Education System by systematically eliminating Ancient Hindu Education System in BhaaratVarsh. Christian educators slowly poisoned the minds of unsuspecting Hindu children against Braahmans. 20th century Nehru dynasty pampered Marxist-fake-Secularist educators who continued the process with greater enthusiasm. Education system, newspapers, magazines, cinema, every possible media was used. With continued repetition every one came to believe that Hindu society practiced gross social injustice in the name of Caste system. Now look at these documented testimonies that give you a totally opposite picture. These testimonies were carefully kept out of your view for long, though they existed all along! You must read them and ask yourself a question—

Can the foundation of Hindu society be based on gross social injustice when ‘justice and truthfulness’ has been the lifeblood of the Hindu Society through the ages?

Max Muller filled 37 pages with examples of Hindu Justice and Hindu love for Truth and he said that he could go on quoting many-many more. To top it he titled the chapter as Truthful Character of the Hindus in his book INDIA what can it teach us? He categorically stated (p.50):

"Now, it is quite true that during the two thousand years which precede the time of Mahmud of Gazni, BhaaratVarsh has had but (*not) few foreign visitors, and few foreign critics; still it is extremely strange that whenever, either in Greek, or in Chinese, or in Persian, or in Arab writings, we meet any attempts at describing the distinguishing features in the national character of the Bhaaratiyas (*Hindus), regard for truth and justice should always be mentioned first."

He goes on to state (p.59):

"I have left to the last of the witness who might otherwise have been suspected—I mean the Hindus themselves. The whole of their literature from one end to the other is pervaded by expressions of love and reverence for truth."

Now tell me—do you think a society could have all along practiced gross social injustice towards its own people, a society whose whole literature from one end to the other is pervaded by expressions of love and reverence for truth?

And why does he say "I have left to the last of the witness who might otherwise have been suspected"? He knew that his audience (ICS aspirants at Cambridge University in England 1882) would think these were for talk not for practice. Therefore, he cited numerous facts based on Hindu life style and conducts before he moved to Hindu literature so that his audience realizes that the teachings of Hinduism were truly reflected in the conduct of the Hindus—and that is the real test—the speech and action must corroborate, or else, it’s fake.

Before Christ was born, 5th Century, Greek physician Ktesias dedicated in his works a special chapter on Justice of the Hindus. Hindu Justice could not have been exemplary to Greeks if Hindu social structure was truly based on a system of gross social injustice towards the vast majority of its own people. This is nothing but plain logic and you do not need vast degree of intelligence to understand it. Nevertheless, let us proceed with (a) what other observers documented about the Hindu society over a period as large as two thousand and four hundred years and (b) witness the kind of consistency those documentations reflect at.

Before Christ was born, 4th Century, Greek Ambassador Megasthenes spoke of Hindu love for Truth and that no Hindu was a slave. Now tell me, how is it that Megasthenes documented in 4th century BC that "no Hindu was a slave" in a society that is supposed to have practiced gross social injustice in form of infamous Caste system?

After Christ was born, 2nd Century, Greek Arrian the pupil of Epictetus said Hindus were never accused of lying. 7th Century Chinese Hiouen-thsang spoke of Hindu Straightforward Honesty and Never Unjust nature. How is it that a society, accused of practicing gross social injustice towards its own people, has been praised by Hiouen-thsang putting it on record ‘with regard to justice, Hindus make even excessive concessions’?

11th Century Muslim Conqueror spoke of Hindu Justice, Good Faith, Honesty and Fidelity. Once again, it has been said that ‘Hindus were naturally inclined to justice and never depart from it in their actions’. How could they have allowed social injustice of the kind they were accused of by Christian educators and Communist educators? Ever wonder if they were educators by profession or professional liars? What was their objective? Did they want Hindu children to get cutoff from their mainstream religious and cultural base and begin to look for alternative with (a) Christianity in ChristianBritish days (b) with Communism/Marxism in so-called post-independence days?

13th Century Italian Marco Polo spoke of Hindu Braahmans as the most Truthful, for they would not tell a lie for anything on earth! Now ask yourself, who have been lying all along? These people from different origins, from different centuries, who came and visited Hindus and came to invariably the same conclusion? Or, Christian missionaries who had the hidden agenda to convert Hindus into Christianity by hook or crook? Or, Communist-Marxist historians of AMU and JNU who had a hidden agenda to spread their wings so they could keep their illegitimately acquired hold over Hindu society? All fraudsters have a brotherhood kind of feeling and they support each other. This is what these Christians and Communists had been doing but simpleton Hindus did not see through their foul play. Wake up my Hindu nation and try to understand their game plan.

On the other hand, only three centuries later, the Saint of Christianity named Francis Xavier of 16th century (we will soon see what other people of 16th century have to say) calls Hindu Braahmans as perverse, wicked and crafty men and terms all Hindus as unholy race (Seed-5). Such happens to be the character of a Saint of Christianity. So, you can well imagine what would be the character of the lesser ones than a Saint. When their ulterior motives are not otherwise fulfilled, they resort to tarnishing the image of others, and in doing so they reveal their own ‘wicked and crafty nature’. The same applies to the ChristianEnglish educated ChristianizedHindus, and CommunistMarxist thinkers who adopted such questionable methods to raise their own social status by fraudulently reducing others. And, on that premise they built their imaginary theory of so-called Oppressive Braahmanism so that they could discredit the Braahmans, and occupy their coveted position in the Hindu society which these characters were not worthy of. Using (rather abusing) their hold over administrative machinery and educational system, they filled Hindu children’s minds with the filth that the Braahmans practiced much despised caste system and untouchability to retain their own superiority and their hold over Hindu society. In the process, they not only tarnished the image of Braahmans in Hindu society, but effectively persecuted Hinduism itself on a much wider scale. Their motive was simple: convert the Hindus into Christians. Communists followed the lead and used the same technique. Their motive was equally simple: convert the Hindus into Communists/Marxists.

13th Century Muslims spoke of Hindus Free of all deceit, violence and fear of death. And, Hindu Braahmans have been accused by Christians and Communists for deceit and violence in form of gross social injustice! The foundation on which the Christians and the Communists built their propaganda was the imaginary theory of Aryan Invasion (Seed-2) and establishment of so-called (imaginary) oppressive Braahmanism. This in itself was a fraud against humanity, and deceit of high order. This crooked theory has caused immense harm to the humanity.

14th Century Friar Jordanus speaks of Hindus True in Speech and Eminent in Justice. But same Hindus are accused of gross social injustice by our Christian educators and Marxist intellectuals. Must you continue to respect these liars who committed social fraud on you? Ask Hindus, ask yourself. Don’t you owe at least, that much to yourself? How long do you wish to live under the spell of these crooks that taught you nothing but lie?

15th Century Persian Ambassador spoke of Perfect Security that Merchants enjoyed in our country. Hindu Kshatriyas fulfilled their duty not only towards their own people but also towards foreign traders and an average Hindu fulfilled his duty towards the society at large. And, what have these crooks given you now after destroying the social fabric of Hindu society?

16th Century Muslim Minister Abul Fazl spoke of Hindu Truthfulness, gratefulness, and unbounded Fidelity and Never flies from Battlefield type character. This was true of every Hindu Kshatriya—when he left for the battle field his mother would tell him that "the day has arrived for which Kshatraanis (Kshatriya women) breast fed their milk to their children and the time has come to repay that debt!" And, what these Christian educators have taught you all along, that, Hindus were so much divided all the time that they could not face the Muslims. Besides, lowering your self-esteem what else have they given you? Have they given you the knowledge that has benefited you, or have they cheated on you while maintaining a poker face all the while? 19th Century common Muslims spoke of Hindu Straightforwardness. Do you find any trace of straightforwardness in these Christian and Marxist educators? Why do you still continue to let them remain your educators?

Max Muller compares legendary Hindu honesty with English and French, and finds it superior to the Europeans. He also mentioned that he can go on quoting book after book and you will find that no one ever accused Hindus of falsehood. Think, my dear fellows, think, can the Truthfulness of this magnitude survive in a society allegedly ridden with social injustice? Or, the allegation itself has been fraudulent, and a fabrication with ulterior motive? We will deal with those motives, in detail, in our other books. You will see from historical evidence that historical frauds have been so common with Christianity from its very inception that it has become the second nature of Christianity. 18th century Warren Hastings [India’s First Governor General 1774-1784] spoke of Hindus as Less prompted to Vengeance for Wrong Inflicted than any people on the face of the earth. This is probably the reason that Hindus continue to tolerate these fraudsters, who have perpetrated social fraud of such magnitude that they have destroyed a great civilization that lasted thousands of years until these crooks arrived on the scene. Expect me not to use better adjectives for them—they should be identified as they have been and as they are. Bishop Heber spoke of Hindus as more easily affected by kindness and attention to their wants and feelings than any people he ever met with. This is probably the reason that Hindus respected Christianity looking at handful of honest Christians like these counted few.

Elphinstone spoke of Hindus about their freedom from gross debauchery. People who live a life of purity, they do not indulge into the kind of gross social injustice they have been accused of, by Christian educators and communist educators.

Sir Thomas Munro, the eminent Governor of Madras, spoke that Hindus were not inferior to the nations of Europe and he was convinced that England had more to gain if Civilization became an article for trade between BhaaratVarsh and England. Do you think Sir Thomas Munro would have said something like this if our Hindu society were ridden with social injustice of the kind these Christian and Marxist educators have told us, and told the world?

Prof. Wilson spoke of better quality of Hindu Honesty at Calcutta Mint than other mints elsewhere in the world. Do you think that the people who cannot have any social justice within their social framework can have people commonly as honest as indicated here?

Prof. Wilson spoke of Braahman Simplicity truly Childish. Do you think that these Braahmans could have been credited with such childish simplicity if they happened to be such dirty people, who were alleged to have created this treacherous caste system for their own benefit? Look at the statement (see Seed-5 Christianity in a different Light—Face behind the Mask) of St. Xavier, which painted Braahmans as perverse and wicked. Look at his reason, which he himself described to the Society of Jesus. Xavier could not convert many Hindus into Christianity. His ulterior motive was hurt. So, he painted Braahmans in such bad light. His successors did the same thing. Later day missionary educated Hindus parroted what their teachers had taught them. Realize that you have learned the falsehood from your Christian educators and you have spread that falsehood further through television serials, movies, newspapers, etc. Now you must stop and reverse that process, which you too are responsible to some extent but only as the pawns in the hands of those master conspirators, who fooled you and cheated you all along. If any one is to be despised, it is not Braahmans but these cheats called Christian educators and Communist-Marxist educators.

Colonel Sleeman has put on record that he had before him hundreds of cases, in which a man’s property, liberty, and life depended upon his telling a lie, and he refused to tell it. Max Muller then asks: Can many an English judge say the same? Could our so-called wretched caste system and a socially unjust society have produced such truthful Hindus incomparable elsewhere? Do you realize the significance of this sentence: Can many an English judge say the same? By deductive logic, if the outcome was so great, then the foundation also had to be equally great. And, that foundation was the 4-Varn System. People with vested interest speak against it. People of ignorance keep parroting the same. Today, if we do not see any trace of such legendary truthfulness amongst Hindus, it is because these Hindus have become Christianized-Hindus, under the very bad influence of six generation of English-Christian Education System, which Macaulay instituted as he wanted to Christianize the Hindus.

Max Muller says that for past two thousand years Greeks, Chinese, Persian, Arabs, all described the most distinguishing feature of Hindu society as its regard for truth and justice, but for two hundred years English-Christian education system taught Hindus that the most distinguishing feature of Hindu society was its social injustice in form of 4-Varn System, which they renamed as caste system. Were these Christian educationists lying all along? Was their lie part of a much bigger conspiracy against Hindu society? Was it to bleed Hindu society to death?

English Merchants spoke that commercial Honor stood higher in India (BhaaratVarsh) than in any other country. Why we do not see any evidence of it today? Is it because Christian educators have completely ruined the sense of ethics amongst Hindus? Educators, who themselves posses no ethics, what else can they pass on to their pupil? If they themselves were not truthful, then how could you expect to learn anything about justice from them?

You must understand this basic fact: if the foundation is based on fraud, its outcome will also be fraud. In this context, English-Christian education system’s foundation was based on fraud against Hindu society. Their purpose was ignoble. Their intentions were conspiratorial. There was simply no regard for truth and justice in their belief system. Therefore, they produced crops like themselves. Students of their education system, through next six generations, gradually continued to become fraudulent like their teachers. They lost regard for truth and justice that happened to be cherished Ethos of Hindu society until two centuries ago!

Max Muller wrote, the whole of Hindu literature from one end to the other is pervaded by expressions of love and reverence for truth. He expressed doubt whether in any other of the ancient literatures of the world you will find traces of that extreme sensitiveness of conscience which despairs of our ever speaking the truth. Now, ask yourself a question. Here stood Hindu society which practiced truth and justice by thought, speech and action for thousands of years, and with consistency. Could there have existed, unnoticed by all concerned, the gross social injustice of such magnitude in form of the infamous caste system? Was it the brainchild of those conspirators, who converted into reality of today, something that was nonexistent in the days of which they spoke of?

Max Muller writes, Hindus may teach us at least one lesson of truthfulness, that is, truthfulness to ourselves. What did Christian educators do? Instead of learning that truthfulness from Hindus, they destroyed the truthfulness of Hindus. This is what you acquire from an Aasuric religion like Christianity. They have destroyed your sense of ethics, justice, truthfulness all that you ever valued.

If it was all so good for 24 centuries continuously, as documented in the testimonies of non-Hindu visitors to this Hindu land, then what went wrong in less than two centuries? The answer is simple. Keeping all factors constant, the only variable on the scene is the presence of Aasuric influence of Christianity, which has eclipsed the Hindu society.

Braahmans were the poorest of all

It generally takes longer to build than to dismantle! Not for centuries, but for millenniums, Braahmans played the exemplary role. They themselves lived as the poorest of the lot but raised rich morals among the rest in the society. And, ample evidence of such rich morals, as documented by many-many foreign visitors to this Hindu land over more than two millenniums, you have already seen. Do you remember the legendry poor DronAachaarya who could not buy milk for his only child Ashwatthaama? Do you remember poor Sudaama who could only carry few grams when he went to meet his childhood friend Shri Krishn? Do you remember the stories that you read during your childhood?

Whenever the central figure of the story happened to be a Braahman, did those stories not begin as "Once upon a time there was a poor Braahman"? Can you remember any story "Once upon a time there was a rich Braahman"? Well, I would not be surprised if you manage to find me one of them created during past fifty odd years by one of those MarxistCommunist intellectual professors of JNU who have mastered the technique of fabricating history in connivance with their bedfellow AMU professors. You will find enough evidence of such historical fabrications in Seed-1.

Conclusion

Now I invite you to take a special note of the fact that all the testimonies that I have presented before, are

The extraordinary character and integrity of Hindu society was incomparable in the recorded history of mankind, and therefore, I see no reason whatsoever to be defensive about our ancient 4-Varn System and try to explain it away apologetically in the manner many modern interpreters tend to do. It is their own low self-esteem that makes them do so. Their knowledge is of no use if they cannot see through the game plan of those conspirators who have brought their self-esteem to this low level.

It is our 4-Varn System that prevented extinction of Hindu society under thousand years of barbaric Islam invasion, whereas financially supported (by Hindus) one-class (monk based) Buddhist society was totally wiped out from BhaaratVarsh on account of the same Islamic invasion.

Hindu Society that was known for its regard for Justice over two thousand years [5th Century BC-AD 19th Century]. Such society could not have been practicing gross social injustice within its own framework. This is nothing but plain and simple logic!

A message to the Braahmans

I am not a Braahman by birth. I have no personal interest in defending you. I am on the side of Dharm. And Dharm is always on the side of Truth.

I won't fight your battle today. You have to do that. I will only hand you the ammunition needed for you to fight that battle of Truth. Let knowledge be your "Bow" and arguments be your "Arrows". This is what I offer you!

Braahmans! Realize your strengths. You have given birth to DronAachaarya, and he had raised an Arjun. You can do that again.

Remember that self-preservation is your birthright. You have to fight for your existence, no one else will. If you are on the side of Truth, others will join you.

You had been the victim of the circumstances. You have been the one who had been truly oppressed. But those who conspired against you, made you look like the oppressor. You have to work towards removing that stigma attached to you.

Granted that you are not a Kshatriya, you are not born to be a fighter. But do not forget ParashuRaam, the Braahman, who assumed the role of Kshatriya when it became necessary for the good of the society.

You have been traditionally the teacher, the guide to the Hindu society. And this society had preserved Humanity for thousands of years under your able guidance.

But today, for past two hundred years, the Asurs have taken the reign of the society leading Hindus to the path of extinction. You must rise to the occasion and blow the bugle!

How then the scenario changed so drastically after middle of 19th century?

I am not going to provide you with all the answers here. The scope of this work is predefined. It is to raise enough doubt in your mind about the veracity of the impressions you hold. If you have any love and pride left in you for your own heritage then you should feel the urge to probe further. And that enquiry should lead you towards the truth. I shall only provide you with some clues here in summarized form.

ChristianBritish made Hindu Braahmans Rich

Things rapidly changed after introduction of ChristianEnglish Education System in 1835, which not only replaced but also systematically eliminated (Seed-2) the ancient Hindu education system from this soil.

You must understand one basic thing that it is education that shapes our understanding of this world and the happenings here; it is the education that shapes our thoughts and attitudes; it is the education that forms our value system.

Braahmans were chosen by the ChristianBritish for their induction into Christianized Anglicized culture. As Braahmans were most literate and capable of adopting any new form of education with ease, they were made the first guinea pigs of new education system. The graduates were given plush jobs in ChristianBritish administration, which dramatically raised their fortunes, as these Braahmans earlier used to be poorest of all Varn(s). With this change in their life style and living comforts - their whole attitude towards life and the society changed. With new Christianized education from childhood the newer generations of Braahman born were made to learn new philosophy and new attitudes towards life and its goal. Now they started becoming no less expansive in their life style and attitudes and the inherent contracting tendencies were soon replaced by Christianized expansive tendencies, the ills of all that we see today.

Braahmans were manipulated by the ChristianBritish

How these Braahmans were manipulated and then gradually victimized is a tale of conspiracy against humanity that I have touched upon in varying degree in two of my earlier works (Seed-2, Seed-6). In this context, it must be understood that none of my works are stand-alone and cannot tell the whole story at one place. There is a continuity and connectivity among all.

In ChristianBritish company Braahmans became the so-called Upper Class

Macaulay had a plan that he described in his own words: "We must at present do our best to form a class who may be interpreters between us and the millions whom we govern; a class of persons, Bhaaratiya in blood and color, but English in taste, in opinions, in morals and in intellect."

Divide and Rule Policy is not British, it is Christian - it is the gift from their messiah Jesus Christ—and, here we have ample evidence from Holy Bible

What you saw above—first creating an upper class— isolating them from the mainstream—then poisoning the masses against that upper class—is the technique of creating division and putting one against the other.

ChristianBritish ran away from BhaaratVarsh in great hurry as they were in tatters due to the immense pressure built from outside (as ChristianGerman led by Adolf Hitler shattered the military supremacy of ChristianBritish) and from inside (Azad Hind Fauz led by HinduBhaaratiya Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose pulled the carpet away from under the feet of the ChristianBritish) but they did not forget to plant their stooges (Jawaharlal Nehru was only one of such numerous characters, perhaps the better known one. However, with new revelations that have become public now, it is becoming apparent that his family was Muslim, not Braahman, not even a Hindu) carefully placed in the new government and thus, left behind their legacy in form of ChristianEnglish educated Hindus who continued to practice Divide and Rule Policy as before.

Now, as to the fact that the Divide & Rule Policy is not the British invention—as is generally perceived by the Hindus— but is the gift of their Messiah Jesus Christ whose authoritative teachings can be found well documented in the New Testament of the Holy Bible—

St Mathew was one of the Chief Disciples of Jesus Christ and he documented in Christian Bible what he heard himself from Jesus Christ. The documentation can be found in the 1st Gospel written by Saint Matthew—10:35 & 10:36 "I am come to set a man at variance against his father, and the daughter against the mother, and the daughter in law against her mother in law. And a man’s foe shall be they of his own household".
This documentation by Matthew was revalidated by Saint Luke who documented the Teachings of Jesus Christ in the 3rd Gospel of the New Testament in Holy Bible—12:51 to 12:53 "Suppose ye that I am come to give peace on earth? I tell you, Nay; but rather division: For from henceforth there shall be five in one house divided, three against two, and two against three. The father shall be divided against the son, and the son against the father; the mother against the daughter, and the daughter against the mother; the mother in law against her daughter in law, and the daughter in law against her mother in law".
St Thomas, better known in BhaaratVarsh, was one of the Chief Disciples of Jesus Christ and he doubly validated the Statements of Jesus Christ by documenting in Gospel of Thomas whatever he heard himself from Jesus Christ—16 Jesus said: Perhaps men think that I came to cast peace on the world; and they do not know that I came to cast division upon earth, fire, sword, war. For five will be in a house, there will be three against two and two against three, the father against the son and the son against the father. And they will stand because they are single ones".

Thus, you witness here what the Messiah himself said in very clear language to his own disciples as to what he truly wanted of his followers. You must realize that all those sweet words about so much overflowing love for humanity is nothing but advertisement to cover up the truth. Therefore, you need to understand very clearly yet another thing—so long influence of Christianity remains on this Hindu land, people living on this land will continue to practice that Divide and Rule Policy.

What you often fail to notice that it is not the "true" Hindus that practice Divide and Rule Policy for they believe in unifying and building, not breaking and destroying (and yet, sometimes it becomes necessary to destroy a rotten base). It is the Hindu born ChristianEnglish Educated and "their offshoots" who, have been and continue to, practice this policy. But then it has become very difficult to isolate them for identification simply because their numbers have grown exponentially, and they have become so numerous that they can be seen everywhere around you. To top it, they take one very special precaution: they do not give up their Hindu names (offhand one example surfaces my mind at this very moment—Arundhati Roy—you will find detailed account of her subverting conducts in my other works but remember that she happens to be just one example, perhaps a better known one; there are plenty of such characters all around you) while continuing their subversion activities. With their suffocating grip over media and power platform of every kind (financial, administration, political arena, government and its institutions, educational, etc.) they keep managing their destructive game un-understood by the gullible (too willing to believe or accept what other people tell you and therefore easily tricked) Hindus.

Hindu Swamis and Gurus—it is their responsibility to fight for Hinduism and help Hindus regain their self-respect

Those who are not apologetic they simply try to avoid detailed discussion on the topic of 4-Varn System fearing controversy. Example, Hindu Swamis and Gurus. It is their responsibility to fight for Hinduism and help Hindus regain their self-respect. But, they have turned Hindus (mentally) impotent, and made them forget their KshaatrDharm (dharm of a Kshatriya). They had been living long on Hindu charity, and showing Hindus the way they have known best.

The problem is that these Hindu Swamis and Hindu spiritual Gurus are educated people. They have been educated by the same education system, which Christian missionaries established under active support of Macaulay plan, and pursued it aggressively through past seven generations. Let me give you an example. During early 2000, I had the opportunity of being invited for afternoon tea, into the personal chamber of the head Swami of an institution that owned a million dollar house, purchased through bank mortgage, installments paid through support of Hindu devotees. My casual glance fell on his collection of books. The only thing that caught my attention was the large collection of Western authors, which dominated the shelves. Beyond this, nothing I thought about it, at that point of time. Only now, years later, I realize its indirect bearing. Your thought process is firmed up based on what you read and hear. This is what has happened to them. They have become Westernized-Christianized, though their garb and belly happens to remain Hindu. I had a chance to look at one of their in-house magazines (year 2001), which glorified Christianity either out of their ignorance of the true character of Christianity, or out of their desire for international funding. At that point of time I did not feel anything wrong in it because I myself was equally ignorant of the true character of Christianity, but what amazes me is that these massive organizations of swamis, and their battalions of swamis who have the reputation of being knowledgeable in matters of religion, should be so very ignorant as well.

Here I must clarify that I do not know all Swamis, so what I say cannot reflect at all of them; but then, I have seen through many of them and what I speak of is essentially true about some aspect of them.

On the other hand, I have come to know of Swami Dayananda Saraswati who is working towards making Hindus aware of their heritage. I have looked at few of his interviews from which I realize that his thought process is not corrupted like some Hindu swamis who now try to present themselves as Secular swamis. I would assume that there must be many others who may want to follow the trail but unable to do so, on account of the constraints placed upon them by the organizations they belong to. I, for one being free from such obligations, am able to speak up freely (Note dated 23 April 2008—I need to qualify my above statement with regard to Swami Dayananda Saraswati. Undoubtedly he is doing commendable work by way of bringing all ShankarAachaarya and Mathaadhipatis together under one banner of Hindu Dharma Acharya Sabha. Such attempts towards unity and collective effort are very much desirable but then it can get into wrong direction if the convener’s belief system is misplaced. There is a serious error which I have brought to his notice more than once with substantial evidence but in his diplomatic fervor he tends to ignore that, and continues to mislead Hindu Dharma Acharya Sabha with wrong belief system. I shall discuss this matter elsewhere because you will not appreciate its significance until you have thoroughly read my later day work on Judaism. Therefore, I keep this matter in abeyance).

Attaining Sannyaas should be a sequential process, as prescribed through the 4-Varn System that Bhagawaan Shri Krishn spoke of—but in their hurry to attain God today’s Swamis tend to skip some steps and thereby, remain totally inexperienced about the relevance of those other steps in human life—what they know of those other steps is often bookish knowledge, not derived from real-life experience.

Rigors of Braahmanical life cycle, as described earlier, requires that an individual has to graduate towards Sannyaas through a systematic process of various steps in life, Brahm’Charya, Grihasth, Vaan’Prasth, Sannyaas, to have a full understanding and real-life experience thereof, and then only he can become the true teacher of the society.

But today, with Christianized influence all around, Hindu Swamis skip the steps and try to graduate straight to Sannyaas, the way Mother Teresa has been put on fast-track towards Sainthood! Attaining God has become a true sports event these days, whereby faster you run, quicker you arrive at the destination; disregard you might take a pretty long nap on the way like the proverbial hare, who ran faster than the tortoise!

Sannyaas has been institutionalized with the influence of Buddhism, and thereby a separate class of people has been carved out of the society that think of themselves as ‘out of the Hindu society’, and above the Hindu society. Two of the major ones even petitioned the High Courts to have them declared non-Hindu religion, on the pretext of more money! [details in other books, this is getting too far, here]
These Sannyaasis live in large buildings on Hindu charity while many Hindus have no roof over their head today. The wealth of Hindu society has been plundered (systematically looted) by the Christian-British, whose greatest contribution to the humanity has been to turn the most prosperous human society on the earth into one of the most deprived ones, within a matter of 110 years; such was the magic touch of Christian-British!

Many of these Sannyaasis/Gurus wear reasonably good quality clothe on their body, again provided by Hindu charity, while many Hindus do not have enough to cover their burning skin. Many of these Swamis/Gurus eat fairly good food, which comes from Hindu charity, while plenty of Hindus do not have two meals a day, thanks to the ChristianBritish (Seed-2).

Many of these Swamis/Gurus have assumed the position of the teachers and guides to the Hindu society on a spiritual level. On other levels, it is the Christian Missionaries and Communist-Marxist intellectuals who have monopolized the market, thanks to Christianized Communist infected Nehru dynasty!

The difficulty is that the Hindu society today has handed over the reigns of their minds to such people who have either travelled far away from true Hindu values, or those who never had any taste of Hindu values at all.

Returning to the base theme—it was not social discrimination but social structure for a balanced society

Eyes blinded and minds shut failing to see the reality

It was not social discrimination but social structure for a balanced society. However, these modern educated with an education system, which essentially arose from a Christian base, fail to see this part of the reality because their eyes are blinded and their minds are shut by an education system, which did not care for truth but for propagating a mission, beneath which lay the hidden motive of expansion of Christian imperialism. (Seed-5)

Oh! That unfulfilled wish...

These Christian societies and our ChristianizedHindu society, which now dutifully apes its Christian counterpart, is rife with social insecurity issues of the magnitude that were unknown in those days of Hindu society. And yet, it is ChristianizedHindus who are pretty much vocal about this alleged discrimination in the Hindu society in the name of Varn system, probably because their only wish to be born with white skin has not been fulfilled.

What Islam could not do...

Islam could not destroy Hinduism but Christianity has done it, in large measure, within 170 years! This is the greatest contribution (or, Curse?) of ChristianEnglish education system in BhaaratVarsh.

Plenty of strength in social structure of Hindu society

Comparative scenario

Consider the success of Hindu 4-Varn System with a village based economy and social structure, not necessitating migration on account of job related needs. As against this, look at the dependence of Christianized urbanized societies on migration of labor, and the ills thereof on issues related to morality.

Consider the extraordinary sense of truth and justice in Hindu village communes, even as late as in the 19th century (Seed-2), and compare its striking absence in today’s litigation-prone Christianized urbanized societies.

Consider the 4-Varn based Hindu society’s extraordinary love for truth and justice as against Christian society’s latent racial discrimination and rich-poor class system with striking absence of true humanitarian feelings, where we do not recognize and care for the next-door neighbor, and ever ready to get into litigation on any instance of so-called infringement of privacy issues and personal rights.

That afternoon of July 2002 in Europe at lunch...

On the question of litigations relating to infringement of privacy issues and personal rights, I cannot resist but to tell you of an interesting episode. It was July of 2002 in Venezia in Europe, lunchtime. While at lunch, I was watching the Italian television after watching Pope John Paul II’s drooping head on the screen for a while, a thing that they ritually do every day lunch time.

A real-life situation, not an imaginary story

A real-life courtroom proceeding was being live telecast. They do this also regularly, everyday around that time, and we get to watch in full view of camera the entire proceedings from beginning till end.

My host explained to me the subject matter of the judicial proceedings. Here was the man and the woman, both neighbors. Subject of litigation was man’s pet dog. This dog was very affectionate to the woman. This affection developed in the days when the man and the woman were in intimate terms and used to frequent each other’s house regularly. So did the dog, he too visited the woman’s apartment regularly. Later the man and the woman broke up. As they broke up they would not visit each other any more. But the dog could not follow the same routine. He would still visit woman’s house regularly. The man had no objection but the woman did. She asked the man to stop his dog from visiting her place. The man tried his best but could not stop the dog from doing so.

Then, the woman sued the man in the court for letting his dog infringe her privacy. The man presented in the court his argument that he attempted his every bit but the dog wouldn’t listen. The woman argued before the court that the dog belonged to the man and therefore, legally, he was obliged to ensure that the dog did not infringe her privacy by visiting her apartment, and thus violating her personal right not wanting the dog to come to her. You can imagine the judge’s predicament in this case as far as delivering a just judgment was concerned. I leave to your imagination what the judge might have done eventually!

So much strength in ancient social structure and how they ruined it

I see plenty of strength in the social structure of yesteryears when I read the testimonies of those days’ independent observers of our society, and with dismay I see these ChristianizedHindus turning a blind-eye towards those; such a disaster had been the Macaulayite ChristianEnglish education system designed to produce "Bhaaratiyas in blood and color, but English in taste, in opinions, in morals and in intellect" as said by Macaulay in his own words.

And then, Castles of Sand they built

On a worldwide scale, if we look at the social structures evolved by Christian societies, Marxist societies and so-called Secular societies, we see them disintegrating already. The base unit family is fast eroding the social fabric of modern society and we can look at the number of years they have withstood the Test of Time.

Nothing surpasses the Test of Time

The Test of Time is the best test, it tells us what works in practice. It has worked for Hindu society; it has not worked for Christian societies, Marxist societies, and Secular societies long enough to stand the Test of Time.

I see NO reason to be defensive

And therefore, I see no reason to be defensive about Hindu system of social structure; those who speak ill of it looking at today’s situation, deliberately shut their eyes towards the fact that this very deterioration is the effect of its long association with Islamic, Christian, Marxist and Secular societies.

It had saved Hindu society from being obliterated

Instead of looking at the cause and effect relationship, Hindu hater BhaaratiyaEnglishmen, ChristianizedHindus and FakeSecularists point fingers at the ancient system, which saved Hindu society from being obliterated by Islamic and Christian imperialism.

All Shoodrs were NOT Untouchable

Manipulating human emotions by repetition right from the childhood

Gandhi & Untouchable ChristianWorld loves to repeat again and again, over and again, the term Untouchable with reference to Hindu society.

In July 2002, I was shown a book that was taught in Italian schools. It was a thin book, which covered Hinduism on one page and other primitive religions of the world on other pages. Hinduism was depicted by an image of Gandhi with an untouchable by his side, creating the impression as if it was all about Hinduism that mattered, and it was all that students needed to know!

Sanjay of BhagavadGita was a Shoodr'

Sanjay is one of the central figures in BhagavadGita. His name appears in BhagavadGita many times. He is the person who narrates to blind Dhrit’Raashtr as to what had been happening at KuruKshetr.

By profession he was charioteer. He drove the chariot of Dhrit’Raashtr. He served Kshatriya Dhrit’Raashtr and was born in a Shoodr family.

If he was untouchable how Dhrit’Raashtr allowed him to touch his chariot or sit next to him inside the palace when the war was in progress?

An example of the Untouchable

Dome (‘o’ as in pope not as in done), for instance, is untouchable. He burned dead bodies. He lived in Shmashaan (crematorium) that are not like Westernized electric crematoriums with nice building and neat environment. The place would be such where there would be skulls around in open, bones, jackals and all such things. Place would not be used for human habitation.

What would be his living habits?

Dome would spend most of his time there. As a result his living habits would be quite unhygienic. His family would not be living far because a Dome may be needed any time, day or night; to burn dead bodies for people do not plan their death during working hours of Monday to Friday.

What would be the living habits of his family members?

His family lived with him and their living habits would not be any different from the dome who would be the head of the family. So the entire family would have similar unhygienic living conditions by normal standards.

Children of the family would live in the same environment; grow up playing in the crematorium environment, as their father would keep himself available to receive dead bodies any time during the day and night, weekday or weekend. His and families living depended on dead people as that was his profession.

Why children would acquire father’s occupation?

People die in villages too for they cannot plan their death by going to cities. Therefore, Dome family would live in a village; children would grow up in village crematorium environment, which would be an open space; they would die in the same place. Their lives would revolve around that place. Thus, generation after generation they would be living at the same place. Children would acquire father’s occupation and the life would go on.

Why they would not feel anything wrong with their living habits?

From their birth till death they would live in the same environment and they would feel quite at home about it. They would not see anything wrong with their living habits because it would feel natural to them.

Why other people would not feel at home with their way of living?

But other people, who would have different occupation, would not feel at home about their way of living. It would not be natural to them because they would be raised in different environment primarily governed by each family’s own occupation.

Touching is the first point of contact in any lesson of hygiene

Why other people would not be comfortable in associating with them? If not for anything else, purely for hygienic reasons other people would not be comfortable associating with dome families. Touching is the first point of contact in any lesson of hygiene.

When it is unhygienic to touch raw vegetables in European departmental stores with bare hands

When I was in Europe and we went to a departmental store (2002), before picking up fruits and vegetables my host put on thin plastic hand gloves and requested me to do so. The explanation was that we could contaminate the uncut fruits and uncut raw vegetables with the germs that we carried on our hands from outside.

Though an average European would consider himself much cleaner than a Bhaaratiya "Dome"

Well, our hands are generally clean, there is no dirt or dust or any such thing. We do not even burn dead bodies. Even with that kind of life style we could have passed on germs from our hands to raw vegetables and fruits by contact of touch!

This was European magnanimity in thought and action

The same European host felt so very appalled by the very thought of human untouchability. I wished my host was called upon to embrace a dome in his living quarters with his original living habits and then I would have wanted to see the European magnanimity of thought and action.

People who clean open drainage systems in cities

There are other people who clean the drainage system. These are open drains with human and animal filth and excrements and all other kind of dirty things in it. These are not the drainage systems of Western countries. People who do the job have to go inside the drain* also, at times, when needed. (*not imaginary, I have seen them (year 2007) doing so when required)

They can’t feel dirty about something that is part of their daily life

Otherwise also they would use their scanty tools to clean those drainage systems. If it is their occupation day in day out then they could not feel dirty about the drains. It is part of their daily lives.

No one looks at their bread with dirty looks

Generally husband and wife both would be working at it. Grown up children too would join them. It runs in the family for this is their livelihood and no one looks at their bread with dirty looks.

But yes, they don’t speak high-funda words like "dignity of labor"

When we talk of dignity of labor we seem to ignore that these people who do their jobs on drainages do not think otherwise. They may not talk these high-funda words for impressing others and impressing themselves but they understand and practice in their own life the dictum of dignity of labor.

They aren’t bothered but it’s others whose sympathy overflows!

They do not feel bad about what they do, for it earns them their daily bread. It is the ChristianEnglish educated people, who love to indulge in intellectual luxury, seem to be more perturbed about it than those who live with it.

They do it 7 days a week 365 days a year

Now these people who earn their bread from cleaning drainage systems, or for that matter cleaning the excrements of other people where there is no direct drainage system connecting each house to municipal sewerage, are in it day in day out, all seven days a week for people do not plan to excrete only during weekdays.

Why they do not feel the necessity to have a different kind of living habit while they are not at work

Naturally these people need to be on job all 365 days a year like it happens in many other occupations too, particularly the high flying modern executive who works not only all seven days but also night hours.

So when they work all 365 days a year they do not see any reason to have a different kind of living environment and living habits than what they do most of their time.

Why, people engaged in other occupations, want to maintain distance from them

As a result their living habits are not so clean by normal standards and if not for anything else, at least for hygienic reasons people engaged in other occupation want to maintain a distance from them.

Let these champions of humanity be a bit more honest

Let these champions of humanity be a bit more honest in their compassion as expressed through their conduct than their empty talks in finding fault with Hinduism.

Love to see one of "those" embrace one of "these" while at work but not for media exposure and free publicity

Again, I would love to see one of those champions of human causes who talk vehemently against untouchability to embrace some of these men, not for applause that would naturally come to them when they do so and their photographs will be splashed all over media, but with total honesty in their heart and love for them; a kind of love that must be proved by actions other than this.

Let their overflowing emotions be tested on acid

Let them show their generosity and commitment by embracing the untouchables when these people are at work cleaning drainage or excreta and let them do it not in presence of those who would readily clap and do it every day for a year.

Who would be a Shoodr?

A Shoodr would be the one who was born in a family that offered services to Braahman, Kshatriya, and Vaishya families.

If "all" Shoodrs were untouchable then how could they gain entry into Braahman, Kshatriya, and Vaishya houses as household help?

If such a person were to be untouchable then how could he or she get inside the house of a Braahman, Kshatriya, or Vaishya family, and do household chores?

Or, would you want to believe that Kshatriyas and Vaishyas—who were wealthy ones in the society—did every small bits of rudimentary job by themselves and did not employ any servants?

Christian missionary educators deliberately planted the lie in the minds of the ChristianEnglish educated to uproot them from their roots

Christian missionaries and educators have preferred to deliberately create an image that all Shoodrs were untouchables for it served a very significant ulterior motive of theirs. They also raised crops of missionary educated Hindus in vast numbers, generation after generation, with the same belief system firmly implanted in their minds.

Why Untouchable is such a sensitive word?

This term untouchable is significant in the context that the kind of sentiment it generates among today’s so-called educated mass is something like a crime against humanity.

A sinister design by the Christian missionary educators

The creation of generalized impression as if all Shoodrs were untouchables and its indiscriminate repetition in itself is a fraud against humanity.

Remember the European departmental store with gloves?

Remember the European departmental store which provided free hand gloves to be put on otherwise clean hands before picking up green vegetables and fruits from the shelves so that germs resident on clean hands do not affect the rest of the stock?

They would have maintained a safe distance, and Hindus did the same

Just visualize what such people would have done if they were to come close to a dome or to a drain cleaner

And, how do you measure the safe distance?

Now how do you define the safe distance? You may say 1.5 meter or you may say 5 feet. Well, do you expect people to a take a measuring tape and see how much distance they are maintaining? Obviously not!

Conveyed so simply that even a child should understand

There has to be a practical way of determining a safe distance. It should be conveyed in simplest possible manner that even a child should understand and remember.

And that would be the length of a shadow

And, that was the length of the shadow. The person whose occupation is such that it makes him or her unhygienic to come in close contact with, maintain a safe distance from that person, a distance that you can visually determine without any other aid.

And people hadn’t yet become Nishaachars

For shadow to be visible you would need the light of the day. Well, people hadn’t yet become Nishaachars (whose life began in the night). With advent of modern age, Nishaachars have grown disproportionately in number.

Ask those champions of human rights a few questions

Now, if your ChristianBritish educators taught you that it was a grave injustice towards humanity then please ask those champions of human rights a few simple questions:

How long would you want to stay a mental slave?

O my Hindu fellow beings! How long do you want to remain a mental slave of those who taught you nothing but to look down upon yourself?

Servants: In today’s so-called "civilized" language of the Christian World they do not call them servant any more—instead they call them domestic help—but they do not do it because they have become more civilized—they do it because they have realized that if they do not pamper the ego of those whom they are dependent on, then they will have to do every job themselves, as in the Western Christian world they are now in short supply (April 2008).

At Venezia, Italia

This article was written in July 2002 at Venezia, Italia. It was suitably edited for inclusion in this book, keeping the essence as it is.

Islamic imperialism, British imperialism

During the British regime, and during the time Christian Church was expanding its wings in BhaaratVarsh, the issue of untouchables assumed significant publicity and notoriety. Therefore, let us start from there.

The society had been under centuries of imperialistic foreign rule, as after Islam came the Portuguese, French, Dutch and the British. They fought among themselves. British the most cunning of all emerged the victorious. Hindu society had already been weakened very substantially by inhumane barbaric presence of Islamic invaders and conquerors. Therefore it could not offer the necessary resistance. Islamic imperialism was already in its last leg and they were all fighting among their own kith and kin, a characteristic typical of any Muslim regime anywhere in the world, in the past, and even today. They first eliminate non-Muslims and then they fight amongst themselves. For British it offered very convenient ground.

BhaaratVarsh was once the land of riches. After British it became a land of poorest. The mass poverty that was inducted during the British regime made the living condition of the poor quite pathetic. Government’s responsibility is to create an environment for better living conditions. British Government in BhaaratVarsh ensured that the exact opposite was done.

Islam’s long presence had already added another dimension. Multiple wives system and resulting number of many children led to population explosion. Growing in numbers was an Islamic motto. When population grows, beyond proportion to the shareable resources of the land, poverty ensues. It affects all, not only those having multiple wives. It indirectly affects all because the total shareable resources of the land are now shared by many more than before.

That poverty encourages unclean living habits. Hindu society was thus subjected to gradual and systematic erosion of resources and a section thereof was reduced to extreme poverty.

Living habits of untouchables in Hindu society

Extreme poverty and unclean living habits generally go together. Living unclean had become part of their nature and habit. They worked as scavengers, drainage cleaners, dead body burners, and in such other occupations.

Shadow of untouchable

Other Hindus with cleaner living habits preferred to avoid touching them or being physically close to them. Shadow was the measure of proximity, easily expressed and understood, and that was the minimum physical distance they would want to maintain.

Earlier days Easterners had never been good at expressing a negative issue in positive manner, which they are gradually learning now from their western counterparts.

Looking in retrospect, they were rather foolish to have said: Avoid the shadow of the untouchable. One should not be so straight and blatant. It would have sounded better if they were to say it in Western way: Remember, hygiene is very important. Keep a minimum physical distance that would be four feet!

Embrace the untouchable

Look at a scavenger, or drainage cleaner on the street and embrace him. Would you do that gladly, and also as often as you see him? Or would you rather want him to first go and take a bath and then wear a clean tidy dress and then come to you for a hand shake only? People who lived dirty, other Hindus avoided touching them and maintaining a specific distance, easily expressed in terms of a shadow.

Living conditions of untouchables in the Hindu society

They lived in a separate locality of the village. They were not slaves to any one. But, they were slaves to their poverty. They had a very low standard of living. They were economically poor, rather extremely poor. Extreme poverty led to unhygienic and unclean living habits. So did the nature of their work and their life-style.

Romans and their slaves

Was the social and economic position of slaves, under Roman Empire, not qualitatively far more worse (including physical cruelty inflicted on them) than the untouchables in the Hindu society, where it was more of a question of avoiding physical contact due to the issue of hygiene, though not exactly expressed in those terms?

South American whites and their black slaves

Was the social and economic position of slaves, in the white Southern American society, not qualitatively worse than the untouchables in the Hindu society, where it was more of a question of avoiding physical contact due to the issue of hygiene, but not slavery?

North American whites and Negroes in their society

Was the socioeconomic position of Negroes, in the white North American society, qualitatively any better than the untouchables in the Hindu society?

Islam and slaves

Was the socioeconomic position of slaves, in the Islamic society, qualitatively any better than the untouchables in the Hindu society?

Egyptians and Pyramids

How were the pyramids built? Whose labor went into building them? What was their status in the Egyptian society? What were their living conditions? Was their socioeconomic position qualitatively any better than those untouchables in the Hindu society?

British Raaj and Bhaaratiya Coolies

What was the status of Bhaaratiyas in the British Raaj? What pride did the English derive by calling the Bhaaratiyas as coolies? How they treated the Bhaaratiyas during their Raaj? How they crushed them under their boots? They were not discriminating a section of the society, but the whole society, the entire nation of people. This was about social inequity.

What about economic inequity? Handfuls of British were gloating at the cost of rest of numerous Bhaaratiyas. Were Bhaaratiyas originally poor or, were they later unjustly robbed off their wealth? If BhaaratVarsh were not a land of wealth, why would Columbus and Vasco da Gama sail in search of the land of extraordinary riches? British took two centuries to make that a land of the poorest!

Was the poverty of untouchables in Hindu society greater than the poverty of the entire Bhaaratiyas nation during the British regime?

British educated Bhaaratiya intellectuals in British Raaj

Intellectuals of any nation have the responsibility of showing the proper path to the rest of the society. For that reason they have been endowed with their intellect. Did the Bhaaratiyas intellectuals serve their role well? Or, did they allow themselves being subjected to the mental slavery of the British?

Did they try to understand the system of division of the society based on individual qualities and nature of work performed by people in the society? Did they try to reeducate the society if it had fallen over the passage of time? Did they fail to recognize the fundamental truth that everything deteriorates with time, and so does the society?

Did they fail to recognize the fact that the Islamic imperialism, which was followed by the British imperialism, also had something significant to do with this deterioration? Did they have any idea as to what centuries of foreign rule, and cultural subrogation, could do to destroy the social structure of a nation?

Did they reckon their responsibility to set it right? Did they work hard enough to restore the system in its original logical shape? Or, did they resort to escapism? Did they find the easy way out to dissociate themselves with their inherent responsibility? Did they find it easier to condemn the system as it is, and withdraw all their social responsibility to rectify the error?

The real issue behind the condemnation – the motive

Christianity had a motive. It had to spread its wings. The easiest preys were those who were less privileged in the Hindu society. Condemnation was the modus operandi. Condemning Hinduism on all possible counts, where the weaknesses could be found, was an effective tool.

Propaganda and the issue of discrimination – the Game

Christian Church told under privileged Hindus that you are underprivileged, join us and there will be no discrimination. However, they conveniently avoided telling them that all Bhaaratiyas are discriminated under British Raaj as coolies. Church also found it in their interest to avoid telling them that all Hindus are discriminated under Christian regime as infidels, in any case. They made it a point to say that all infidels would not be eligible for salvation. They did not hesitate conveying to the human race that only Christians were worthy of salvation. In other words, they did tell the humanity that God discriminated human race based on their religion.

Oppression of the humankind

What social equity, justice, humanitarian treatment, right to live on their own, economic parity, were offered by British Raaj to Bhaaratiyas, by Romans to their slaves, by South American Whites to their black slaves, by North American Whites to their Negro inhabitants, by followers of Islam to their slaves and to the followers of other religions, and by Christian Church to the followers of Hinduism? And now, they champion themselves speaking of social justice and equity!

Our images and impressions

Our images about others are often faulty. For, they are often based on what we are told through books or what we are shown through commercial media that often thrives on sensationalism, or has other vested interests including missionary ambitions.

Negative impressions about others are easily formed. We see American films full of sex in its barest form and violence in its crudest form. We read so much about Italian Mafia or see them in movies. We read or hear about genocide by Christians and Muslims in earlier centuries in the name of Crusade or Jihad and of Christian oppressions on native red Americans. We have not yet started taking sufficient interest in unpublicized Christian Church’s ignoble activities in British BhaaratVarsh, whose documentation is now gradually becoming available.
So, do we say that Americans are sex-maniacs and gun-crazy? Do we say that Italians are gangsters? Do we say that Christians are mass murderers? Answer is an emphatic No, yet it is easy to jump to such conclusions.

BhagavadGita — Adhyaay' 1 — Arjun'Vishaad'Yog' — Shlok' 1
Participants in the Battle of Dharm' and Adharm' — Shlok' 2-20
Arjun’s Dilemma — Shlok' 21-39
Arjun’s Concerns about the deterioration of the eternal Family-Dharm' — Shlok' 40-43
Arjun’s Concerns about the deterioration of the eternal Family-Dharm' — Shlok' 40-43 (continued)
Arjun’s Concerns about the deterioration of the eternal Family-Dharm' — Shlok' 40-43 (continued 2)
Arjun gives up and resigns, so has Hindu given up — Shlok' 44-47